Barrister reprimanded for “offensive” tweets aimed at colleague


Bennett: £500 fine

A barrister has been reprimanded for allowing a Twitter account with which he was associated to send “inappropriate and offensive” tweets to a colleague at the same chambers.

Daniel Bennett has also been fined £500 for seven tweets directed at Adam Wagner over nine months in 2018-19.

Mr Bennett – a solicitor turned barrister who specialises in personal injury – resigned from high-profile London set Doughty Street Chambers in 2019 after his role in the @arrytuttle account was uncovered.

Known as Harry Tuttle, the name of a character played by Robert De Niro in the film Brazil, the now-deleted account was apparently characterised by aggressive support for Jeremy Corbyn and attacks on Jewish people questioning antisemitism in the Labour Party.

As well as Mr Wagner, a fellow Doughty Street tenant, the account went after other prominent Jewish barristers David Wolfson QC of One Essex Court – who subsequently became Lord Wolfson when he was appointed a minister at the Ministry of Justice – and Simon Myerson QC of St Pauls Chambers in Leeds.

Other targets were David Collier, a blogger, researcher and campaigner against antisemitism, TV presenter Rachel Riley, and actress Tracy Ann Oberman.

Those three sued Mr Bennett, claiming they were each the victim of a campaign of defamation and harassment conducted by the operator of the account. As part of that, in 2020 the High Court ordered Mr Bennett to hand over details of who else had access to the @arrytuttle account. The case has since settled on a confidential basis.

The full ruling of the Bar Tribunal & Adjudication Service has not yet been published but a Bar Standards Board summary said Mr Bennett “allowed to be tweeted, inappropriate and offensive tweets towards AW, another barrister, from the Twitter account ‘@arrytuttle’”.

The tweets included that Mr Wagner was “a lying propagandist who brings shame on our entire community with his smears” – Mr Bennett himself is Jewish – and that all of his “antisemtism (sic) stories are fraudulent. And he knows it”.

Another tweet, responding to one from Mr Wagner, said: “Every day platformed jews from the self-appointed ‘mainstream’ direct hatred at leftist Jews. Every day they misrepresented facts. Every day they pretend that leftist jews are antisemitic. All this for factional political gain. It’s the vilest and sickest trait in modern politics.”

There was also one that described Mr Wagner as “an absolute danger and a hater of leftist jews. Would not go near him with a barge pole”.

Mr Wagner tweeted on Friday: “This has all been incredibly stressful as you might imagine so I’m not going to say anything more about it for now.” But he urged others not to direct any personal abuse at Mr Bennett. “Two wrongs don’t make a right, and neither do three or four.”

The tribunal decision remains open to appeal. Mr Bennett’s LinkedIn profile simply describes him as “self-employed”.




    Readers Comments

  • Nicholas O'Brien says:

    Another long delay for a decision by BTAS
    A simple case to decide.
    3 years to wait for a decision, even if Covid-19 caused further delay


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


The marathon to achieving equity in law

For those in the legal profession, the road to gender equity is a marathon and, although considerable progress has been made, the sector has some miles to go.


Building a brand – lessons from Cazoo

Building a brand takes more than money – just ask Alex Chesterman, the founder of ill-fated online used car retailer Cazoo, which collapsed into administration last month.


The future of organic search for law firms

In a significant turn of events, thousands of internal Google search API documents have recently been leaked, shedding light on the intricate workings of the search giant’s ranking algorithms.


Loading animation