Bar Council sets sights on solicitors’ advocacy ‘conflict of interest’

Print This Post

9 May 2014

Lavender: action needs to be taken

The Bar Council has called for strict new rules to check that criminal law solicitors are acting properly when they guide clients to in-house advocates as opposed to external counsel.

The move came in response to the Jeffrey review on criminal advocacy, published earlier this week, which highlighted the ever increasing share of the market enjoyed by solicitor-advocates – as well as concerns among some judges about their quality.

The accusation is that the legal aid system is set up in such a way as to give solicitors a financial incentive to point clients towards their in-house advocates, rather than the independent Bar, creating a potential conflict of interest.

The report’s author, Sir Bill Jeffrey, said “the fact that there are now at stake commercial interests internal to the firm makes it even more important that the process of assigning an advocate should be above reproach”.

He encouraged the Solicitors Regulation Authority and Law Society to consider “what further regulatory or other steps could be taken to clarify and reinforce the professional responsibilities of solicitors in the assignment of advocates”.

The Bar Council said this could be achieved by including in the litigator’s contract with the Legal Aid Agency a requirement that, in any case where an in-house advocate has been retained, that the solicitor’s firm should have advised in writing, or at least have retained a written record of any advice, as to the reasons for recommending the in-house advocate, the alternative advocates considered, the client’s right to instruct advocates who are independent of the solicitor’s firm, and, where appropriate, the limitations on the rights and experience of a ’plea-only advocate’ as compared with other advocates.

The Bar Council said the advice, or record of advice, should be signed or otherwise acknowledged in writing by the client, and that these records should be available to be produced for inspection by the judge in the case, as well as by the Legal Aid Agency.

Further, the barristers’ representative body said the Criminal Procedure Rules Committee should amend the plea and case management forms so as to require, in any case where a defendant is represented by an in-house advocate, confirmation that such advice has been given and acknowledged by the client.

Bar Council chairman Nicholas Lavender QC said: “Sir Bill’s [findings] demonstrate that action needs to be taken to ensure that properly skilled and experienced advocates are instructed in all cases and are instructed in good time to ensure that the trial is properly prepared and conducted.”

Tags: , , ,

2 Responses to “Bar Council sets sights on solicitors’ advocacy ‘conflict of interest’”

  1. 11 May 2014

    Dear Legal Futures

    I am speaking as a lay person, not a lawyer, and ask precisely what is going on in the Legal Services in England and Wales?

    We seem to be in a state of chaos and yet only a few years ago it was unheard of to have barristers “going on strike” and solicitors rebelling against the Law Society.

    Why have we got to this point? The Legal Services Act 2007 was supposed to widen access to legal services but it seems to have had a very uneven outcome.

    Alternative Business Structures – known colloquially as “Tesco Law” – could be the death knell of the traditional legal services in England and Wales.

    It must be asked just what the country wants and needs.

    Rosemary Cantwell

  2. Rosemary Cantwell on May 11th, 2014 at 9:23 pm
  3. Don’t agree with this – it’s looking at the wrong problem. How about making the case for litigators fees (inc for attending in court) to be increased so that solicitors don’t have to rely on advocacy to pay their wages? After all, some solicitors may instruct members of the independent Bar for entirely the wrong reasons eg friendship : what are we going to do about that??

  4. kate mallison on May 12th, 2014 at 8:35 am

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Why your firm should support working mothers to the hilt

Georgina Hamblin

If you are going to balance the demands of work and childcare, and stay sane, you need to adapt, and with any luck your firm will adapt with you. In doing so you will both win, and your respective productivity will soar. When I had my son, I realised just how lucky I was. Not only did I have the incredible support of my, and my husband’s, family through this life-changing time, but I had a firm that offered me complete flexibility and control over my return to business life.

April 19th, 2018