Bar Council to give guidance on consumer contract regulations – more than a month late


contract

The new regulations came into force on 13 June

The Bar Council has announced that it will shortly be issuing guidance on the new consumer contract regulations – more than a month after they came into force and two months after the Law Society issued its guidance.

In a tweet last week, the Bar Council said it had received “queries” from barristers about the regulations, that the issue was “being considered as a priority” and “a document will be issued by 25 July”.

The Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013 came into force on 13 June this year.

The Public Access Bar Association (PABA) issued guidance on the new regulations the day before they came into force.

Andrew Granville Clarke, chairman of PABA, said the regulations “will clearly apply in a very large number of public access cases”.

He said that while they would not apply to instructions from a solicitor or corporate body, they would apply to “instructions from an individual in respect of their personal affairs, such as a family or immigration client, a tenant, an employment claim by an employee, and so on”.

Mr Granville Clarke said that under the regulations it would be a criminal offence to enter in to an ‘off-premises’ contract (but not a distance contract) without giving the required information.

“There is a ‘due diligence’ defence, but as it requires proving the commission of the offence was due to someone’s else’s default it is unlikely to apply to a barrister/client contract.”

Mr Granville Clarke added that the Law Society’s guidance was more helpful than that produced by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, much of which would not apply to public access work.

Craig Budsworth, chairman of the Motor Accident Solicitors Society, warned personal injury lawyers in May that failure to comply with the regulations, which apply to conditional fee agreements signed inside and outside the office, could result in unenforceable contracts, loss of fees and fines from the Legal Ombudsman.

The Law Society issued its guidance on 14 May, warning that the new regulations would apply to a “wide range of contracts” made between solicitors and their clients.

One of the changes is the extension of the cancellation period for consumer contracts from seven to 14 days. The latest regulations replace those introduced in 2008, covering sales made in the office or the client’s home, and earlier distance selling regulations.

A spokesperson for the Bar Council would not comment on where the queries had come from that prompted it to prepare the guidance, other than they were directed to the ethical enquiries service and were therefore confidential.

 

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

No larger firm can ignore the demands of innovation – that was the clear message from our most recent roundtable: “The law firm of the future”, sponsored by LexisNexis Enterprise Solutions. It comes in many forms, predominantly but not just technology, and is not simply a case of automating process. Expertise and process are not mutually exclusive.

Blog

16 November 2018

Transparency is about a lot more than just price

The transparency agenda is much more than the figures you put on your website; it all comes back to communication, the root of so many lawyers’ problems if you look at the types of complaint that go to the Legal Ombudsman.

Read More