Ban for PI fee-earner who used Covid as excuse for missing deadlines


Slater & Gordon: Fee-earner tried to blame scanning

A fee-earner at Slater & Gordon who falsely claimed he had missed litigation deadlines because of scanning errors and not being in the office due to the pandemic has been banned from working in law firms.

Michael Berry worked as a legal advisor in the personal injury department at Slater & Gordon in Manchester for a year to October 2020.

A notice published by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) said that, on 6 July 2020, he filed with the court and served on the defendant, an application for relief from sanctions and an extension of time to serve a claim form, particulars of claim, medical evidence and schedule of special damages. The extended date for service was 20 June 2020.

They were supported by his witness statement, which “falsely and/or misleadingly purported to evidence” that he was not aware that the court had made an order on the extended service a year earlier because it had not been scanned onto the firm’s case management system.

He further claimed that, due to the Covid restrictions, he was not able to review the paper file in the office and so the order was first discovered on 6 July 2020 during an audit. He said counsel had then been instructed to settle the particulars of claim urgently.

The following month, Mr Berry did the same on another matter.

The SRA said he breached multiple principles, including acting with honesty and integrity.

As Slater & Gordon is an alternative business structure, Mr Berry was made subject to a disqualification order under section 99 of the Legal Services Act 2007, which prevents him from working in a licensed body.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


On good authority? GenAI and the reputational risks to law firms

As GenAI’s influence grows, so do the risks which are already playing out in courtrooms across England and Wales, where some early adopters are setting precedents they would rather not.


Why this is the year for law firms to embrace generative AI

After more than a year of pilots, proofs of value and early experimentation, firms are increasingly embedding AI into day-to-day workflows.


Client account interest is not spare change

The proposed Interest on Lawyers’ Client Accounts scheme is being framed as a sensible, international, “tried and tested” way for the profession to help fund a justice system under strain.


Loading animation