Ban for office manager who used client money to prop up firm


SRA: Still investigating firm

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has imposed a control order on a law firm’s office manager who took money from client account to pay wages and “prop” up the practice.

Jacque Aitken was “incredibly apologetic” for her actions and was actually the person to alert the regulator to the missing money.

She has been made subject to an order under section 43 of the Solicitors Act 1974, which means she cannot work in the profession in future without the SRA’s permission.

She worked at Simpkins & Co in Lyndhurst, Hampshire for eight years. In her role, she had access to its bank accounts and was partly responsible for the payment of invoices and expenses.

According to a regulatory settlement agreement published yesterday by the SRA, Ms Aitken admitted that, from August 2022, she made numerous transfers from the client accounts of two clients – in excess of invoices delivered – that totalled £176,000.

She used the money to pay for office expenses, including staff wages and repaying business loans.

“Ms Aitken was aware that it was wrong to make such transfers,” the agreement said.

She left the firm in April 2023 and the SRA said it continued to investigate the matter.

The regulator acknowledged her remorse and that the transfers were made to stop the firm from failing, rather than for her own benefit.

“At the time of the conduct, Ms Aitken was experiencing a high level of stress and was not, in her view, afforded support by her employer,” the agreement went on.

“Ms Aitken held the belief that the money taken from the matters of Client A and Client B would be replaced promptly by the payment of invoices and costs due to the firm.”

The SRA and Ms Aitken agreed that, though she had acted to “prop up” Simpkins & Co, her actions made it “undesirable for her to be involved in a legal practice”; she accepted that “ordinary and decent people would regard her conduct as dishonest”.

“There is a risk that Ms Aitken may act in a similar way in the future if she were to be employed in a comparable role in a law firm and there is a strong public interest in controlling Ms Aitken’s employment at firms we regulate.”

Ms Aitken also agreed to pay SRA costs of £400.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


There are 17 million wills waiting to be written

The main reason cited by people who do not have a will was a lack of awareness as to how to arrange one. As a professional community, we seem to be failing to get our message across.


The case for a single legal services regulator: why the current system is failing

From catastrophic firm collapses to endemic compliance failures, the evidence is mounting that the current multi-regulator model is fundamentally broken.


AI and due diligence: the SRA’s next regulatory blind spot

As AI-assisted due diligence becomes embedded in law firm work, a sharper question emerges: what happens when the system misses something material?


Loading animation
loading