Automated small claims platform secures £550,000 in funding


Iatsukha: Access to justice not well developed in small claims

An automated platform which uses generative AI to “hold the hand” of customers throughout the small claims process has secured £550,000 in its second funding round.

Michael Iatsukha, solicitor and co-founder of CaseCraft AI, said the platform used chatbots to help claimants and defendants with small claims, and if successful, charged fees of 10% of the amount claimed.

Mr Iatsukha said four co-founders “started brainstorming ideas” two years ago for which areas of the law could best be transformed by AI.

Having looked at immigration and employment law, they considered discovery before deciding that small claims was “the one area where access to justice is not as developed as anywhere else”.

Mr Iatsukha, a partner at London law firm Sterling Law, said there was “almost no ability” for people to claim the costs of small claims cases and it made “almost zero sense” to go to a law firm because of the fees.

He said that more than half of all small claims ended with default judgments, as people struggled to file an acknowledgement of service or defence.

It was also clear from phone calls received by Sterling Law that people did not know how to initiate small claims.

Mr Iatsukha and Ruslan Kosarenko, senior partner of Sterling Law, joined forces with Dmitry Bagrov, a managing director of global software firm DataArt, whose UK office he established, and fund manager Alexander Mints to found CaseCraft AI.

They have recruited Ed Crosse, a partner at City firm Simmons & Simmons and a former president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, to act as an adviser.

Mr Iatsukha said CaseCraft had been going through a “closed testing process” with over 100 clients from Sterling Law before its launch, which is planned for later this month.

Mount Fund was the lead investor in the latest funding round. Mr Iatsukha said CaseCraft raised £500,000 in its first funding round.

CaseCraft has no full-time, employed staff, but instead uses a team of around a dozen freelance workers.

Mr Iatsukha said CaseCraft customers paid £15 for onboarding and, if successful in their case, 10% of the amount claimed.

The gov.uk website could explain how customers should progress their small claims cases but could not “hold the claimant or defendant’s hand” throughout the process.

Among the tasks that CaseCraft can perform are finalising a pre-action protocol letter and preparing and issuing the claim form.

Mr Iatsukha said that, for the time being, it could only handle cases eligible for the HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) money claims online service, though there were plans to expand the service to other small claims.

Customers must use the free mediation phone call for small claims provided by HMCTS and CaseCraft can help them arrange it.

Laert Karaashev, head of venture capital at Mount Fund, commented: “We are proud to support CaseCraft AI in its journey to bring innovation to the UK’s small claims process.

“By making the system more accessible and efficient through cutting-edge AI, the platform has the potential to become a true champion for consumers.”




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Change in regulator shouldn’t make AML less of a priority

While SRA fines for AML have been climbing, many in the profession aren’t confident they will get any relief from the FCA, a body used to dealing with a highly regulated industry.


There are 17 million wills waiting to be written

The main reason cited by people who do not have a will was a lack of awareness as to how to arrange one. As a professional community, we seem to be failing to get our message across.


The case for a single legal services regulator: why the current system is failing

From catastrophic firm collapses to endemic compliance failures, the evidence is mounting that the current multi-regulator model is fundamentally broken.


Loading animation