ASA rejects personal injury advert complaint because consumers ‘now understand how claims work’

Print This Post

8 April 2015


TV: consumers have general awareness of what is needed to claim

TV: consumers have general awareness of what is needed to claim

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has rejected a complaint against a west country personal injury law firm, saying that consumers now have “a general awareness that to have a valid claim there would have to be some degree of fault or negligence by a third party”.

The complainant said the TV advert from Harris Fowler implied it was possible to make a claim for compensation after any accident, irrespective of whether there was negligence.

The advert showed a series of accidents – a wheel coming off a barrow causing the man pushing it to fall and to tip its contents onto a road, and another man walking along the pavement while other incidents occurred around him, including a car driving into the back of a stationary vehicle and a man falling off a ladder propped against a street lamp.

A presenter shown walking along the pavement then said: “Have you thought of claiming compensation after an accident? If you’ve had an accident at work, or a road traffic accident – an accident anywhere it’s your right to claim. You could be entitled to thousands of pounds in compensation.”

The presenter continued later: “It’s no win, no fee … you’ve got nothing to lose and perhaps a lot to gain.”

The complainant, a commercial insurance broker, challenged whether the statement “an accident anywhere it’s your right to claim” was misleading.

In response, Harris Fowler told the ASA that the advert had been on air since 2009 without complaint. It said the wording was not intended to imply that a claim could be made in the event of a non-fault accident – the advert showed ‘fault’ accidents – but “to indicate a generalisation of location”.

In its adjudication, published today, the ASA said it considered that “most viewers would be familiar with the concept of personal injury compensation and the services offered by personal injury solicitors. They would therefore have a general awareness that to have a valid claim there would have to be some degree of fault or negligence by a third party”.

However, it would not always be obvious to a consumer whether or not they had a valid claim in their particular circumstances, the ASA continued.

The ruling said: “We considered that, in the context of the ad and the various accidents shown, consumers would understand from the claim ‘an accident anywhere it’s your right to claim’ that if they had been involved in any accident they might be able to make a claim, and they could therefore contact Harris Fowler for further advice and to potentially pursue a claim.

“The ad said consumers ‘could’ be entitled to compensation and ‘perhaps’ had a lot to gain, which emphasised compensation was not guaranteed. We did not consider that the claim implied compensation claims would be valid even when no fault could be established and therefore concluded that the claim was not misleading.”

Tags: , ,



One Response to “ASA rejects personal injury advert complaint because consumers ‘now understand how claims work’”

  1. I am Health and Safety trained with too much time on my hands so would like to say that the guy who fell of the ladder would be sacked on the spot for leaning it on a lamp post full stop and if leaning against a structure designed for it would still be sacked for non use of ladder tie and no cones to warn pesestrians. Feeling better woo hoo! time for my meds

  2. Gary Neal on December 19th, 2017 at 5:35 pm

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Court modernisation: Court Service spins response to NAO report

Roger Smith

After months of debate on the court modernisation programme led by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service, we now have an authoritative analysis from the National Audit Office. HMCTS chief executive Susan Acland-Hood professed herself happy. The report was “helpful and constructive”. She was pleased that “the NAO acknowledges our ‘early progress’”. Her comments were more reflective of spin than the span of the NAO report. The NAO acknowledges the ambitious nature of the reform. But comments like “HMCTS’s change portfolio presents a very significant challenge” need minimal decoding to reveal a bit of concern.

May 17th, 2018