SRA calls for evidence as indemnity deadline approaches


Crispin Passmore

Passmore: “Everything leads us towards gathering more evidence”

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has issued a call for evidence on its indemnity insurance reforms, as the Legal Services Board (LSB) continues its deliberations on whether or not to approve a cut in the minimum cover limit.

The LSB has a further week to decide to back the cut in cover from £2m to £500,000, to delay its decision for a further three months or reject the move.

Crispin Passmore, executive director of policy at the SRA, told Legal Futures there was a “very simple” reason for the regulator’s announcement.

“Whatever decision the LSB makes, everything leads us towards gathering more evidence for the changes. If the answer is yes, we will still need to get more evidence for the rest of the package.

“If the answer is yes, but we don’t have it in time for October, then the sooner we can get the evidence, the more we can ensure that any changes for next year are signalled well in advance. One of criticisms has been that we’ve done this too close to October.

“If it is no, then that will be because the LSB is not convinced by the evidence. So the answer is to get more evidence.”

“The LSB is there to make a statutory decision on our rules. The presumption in the Legal Services Act is that it will approve them. If not, they need a reason.”

The SRA said it was particularly interested in evidence on ways in which regulation could reduce the risk of claims and the extent to which risk is shared between consumers and legal businesses.

Other issues it highlighted were the impact of the minimum indemnity terms, how far cover should be aligned with the nature of the services provided and the degree to which client protection arrangements were understood by consumers.

Earlier this week the Sole Practitioners Group became the latest body to attack the proposed cut in minimum indemnity cover, despite the fact the move was designed to help small firms.

Mr Passmore added that the SRA wanted to hear from solicitors, consumers, lenders, insurers, as well as people outside the legal market or in other jurisdictions.

“We’re not proud. We’ll learn from anyone.” The deadline is 30 September.

Tags:




    Readers Comments

  • Eric Golding says:

    Why is the SRA still calling for evidence when its consultation period closed some time ago? Is this an admission the consultation was too rushed?


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

6 December 2019

Still running Windows 7? Cyber-criminals are on your trail

at When the end-of-life date arrives, it is estimated thone in four PCs will still be running Windows 7. This figure will be higher in industries slower to embrace IT developments – legal is likely to be amongst those.

Read More

Loading animation