Apprenticeship funding cut “will not reduce” availability of skills


Gibson: Funding changes risks closing doors

The restriction of funding for Level 7 apprenticeships, like those for solicitors, will not cause a “significant or unavoidable fall” in the supply of skills, the government insisted yesterday.

Work and pensions minister Andrew Western told a debate in Parliament that the decision in May to limit funding from January to those aged 16-21 put the focus on young people, “who for too long have not been able to access the apprenticeship opportunities they need to get ahead”.

The age limit will be 24 for those who are care leavers or have an education, health and care plan in place.

The debate was led by Liberal Democrat MP Sarah Gibson, whose focus was on the impact of the decision on diversity in the architectural profession – a concern mirrored among lawyers.

“For underprivileged children, apprenticeships are a fantastic route into higher education. Certainly, in architecture, apprenticeships mark genuine progress in opening the door to a profession that has been closed to those from lower incomes or from under-represented backgrounds,” she said.

“The government’s decision to restrict apprenticeship funding to those aged 16 to 21 threatens that progress.”

Responding, Mr Western highlighted the value of apprenticeships for young people in particular and was why “we need to prioritise public funding towards them”.

He explained: “Skills England was asked to provide insight into the impact of removing funding from Level 7 apprenticeships. It engaged with more than 700 stakeholders from various sectors, employer representative bodies and young people.

“It was clear that, although apprenticeship training at Level 7 is important for meeting the skills needs of the economy, alternative routes are well supplied. Skills England’s evidence suggested that there was unlikely to be a significant or unavoidable fall in the supply of these skills in the long-term post defunding.”

A “significant proportion” of Level 7 apprentices were from “non-deprived backgrounds”, the minister said, “and they are significantly less likely to be deprived than those at lower levels”.

Compared with other apprenticeships, those at Level 7 generally also have a higher proportion of older learners, he added.

Mr Western said the government was encouraging more employers to invest in upskilling their staff members aged 22 or older to Level 7.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Fixed recoverable costs: Sacrificing justice for predictability?

The extended fixed recoverable costs regime is failing to achieve its stated objectives. Instead of promoting fairness and efficiency, the rules are creating anomalies that undermine justice.


Expectations keep rising, so prioritise client experience

Law firms are facing growing pressure to place greater focus on client experience or risk falling behind in an increasingly competitive legal market.


Want sustainable growth? Look to operational excellence

Many firms are being forced to reassess where growth will come from. Increasingly, the answer lies in operational excellence: creating capacity from existing teams.


Loading animation