Another firm falls foul of ‘social engineering’ telephone scam


Are you sure you know who's on the other end?

Are you sure you know who’s on the other end?

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has urged solicitors to be extra vigilant after a north-east conveyancing firm became the latest victim of telephone bank scammers.

The firm lost a significant amount from its account and the crime follows two further serious telephone scams in March this year.

In each case the callers have used a technique known as ‘social engineering’ to gain the confidence of those they call and obtain information to access accounts. They ask for ‘challenge and response’ codes, which are then used to authenticate payments and in some cases digital banking log-in and password credentials. Four firms were targeted in this way in November last year, losing £2m between them.

Robert Loughlin, the SRA’s executive director of operations and quality, said: “We are very concerned about this continuing activity. The fraudsters are highly sophisticated in their approach and their script makes them sound as though they are genuinely who they say they are.

“Solicitors throughout England and Wales are raising this serious issue as one of their major concerns in general discussions with us. We are aware of firms of all sizes receiving calls – this isn’t something that affects just one sector of the profession.

“All firms should ensure that their own internal systems for guarding against scams are up-to-date and that staff know how to implement them.”

The SRA reminded solicitors that banks will never ask for passwords or account related details over the phone. If employees are concerned about the authenticity of a caller, they should terminate the call and make further enquiries.

To validate callers, firms should contact somebody they already know at the bank, using a separate telephone line. There have been examples of the scammers keeping telephone lines open, to intercept an outgoing call.

More information from the SRA can be found here.

Tags:





Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Change in regulator shouldn’t make AML less of a priority

While SRA fines for AML have been climbing, many in the profession aren’t confident they will get any relief from the FCA, a body used to dealing with a highly regulated industry.


There are 17 million wills waiting to be written

The main reason cited by people who do not have a will was a lack of awareness as to how to arrange one. As a professional community, we seem to be failing to get our message across.


The case for a single legal services regulator: why the current system is failing

From catastrophic firm collapses to endemic compliance failures, the evidence is mounting that the current multi-regulator model is fundamentally broken.


Loading animation