All Daily Mail sting solicitors to face disciplinary tribunal


SDT: Similar allegations against all three solicitors

The three solicitors whose firms were shut down last year after being named in a Daily Mail undercover investigation are to face the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT), it was confirmed yesterday.

After a notice of Muhammad Nazar Hayat’s referral to the SDT was published last month, notices for the other two, Muhammad Azfar Ahmad and Rashid Ahmad Khan, were published yesterday – even though the decisions to prosecute were taken in January and February respectively.

The newspaper claimed in July 2023 that various lawyers had offered to help an undercover reporter concoct a story to support an asylum claim.

Amid huge political and media pressure, the SRA then closed the firms after receiving the recordings and transcripts from the newspaper.

The firms were Rashid & Rashid in south-west London, Kingswright Solicitors in Birmingham and Lincoln Lawrence in west London, Mr Hayat’s firm.

Mr Ahmad, the principal at Kingswright, is accused of advising a person he believed to be a prospective client to provide “a false narrative in support of an asylum claim” and/or “to enter into a marriage, in the absence of a genuine relationship, for the purpose of regulating his immigration status”.

Mr Rashid, principal of Rashid & Rashid, is accused of giving advice on two separate occasions which “encouraged a false narrative to be put forward in support of an asylum claim”.

The interventions automatically suspended the three men’s practising certificates and the SRA has refused each of their subsequent applications to return to practise.

The most recent was Mr Ahmad’s, with the SRA saying it was “not in the public interest” to grant him a practising certificate. The decision was made in March but only published last month.

“Mr Ahmad’s alleged conduct poses a risk to the reputation of the profession and the trust and confidence the public places in the profession and the provision of legal services.”

The allegations are as yet unproven.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


How legal judgement is shifting in in-house practice

Across UK organisations, legal teams are now involved earlier in decision-making, often before proposals have taken a settled shape.


AI in family law – drawing the line for clients and lawyers

AI is becoming increasingly intertwined with family law. Clients are using it to draft initial enquiries, prepare statements and, in some cases, to support themselves as litigants in person.


Why AI and leadership choices will define law firm profitability in 2026

Despite rapid advances in legal technology, the future of law will not be determined by software alone. It will be shaped by leadership decisions.


Loading animation