Alcoholic solicitor who assaulted paramedics struck off


Paramedics: Act of kindness towards solicitor

A male solicitor convicted of sexually assaulting two female paramedics while drunk at 8am has been struck off.

David Marriott, who was not practising at the time, was sentenced at Leeds Crown Court last December to eight months in prison, suspended for 12 months, and was placed on the Barring List for 10 years.

On the morning of 25 June 2018, Mr Marriott was reported as drunk in the middle of the road and was attended by two female paramedics.

According to an agreed outcome put before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, he did not need hospital treatment and the paramedics drove him home in act described by His Honour Judge Mairs “as an act of kindness”.

Once at his home, the first paramedic A went into Mr Marriott’s living room and he insisted that she sit down. “The respondent grabbed her, insisting she sit down. Paramedic A began to clean up the mess in the respondent’s flat. The respondent grabbed Paramedic A’s arm and deliberately grabbed her bottom in a grip over clothing.

“The respondent then went into his kitchen, made various remarks to Paramedic B, including that he was a dangerous man and didn’t care. The respondent put his arm around Paramedic B who walked away.

“The respondent then grabbed her breast and kissed her on the face; Paramedic B could feel the respondent’s saliva in her hair. The paramedics promptly left the respondent’s home.”

HHJ Mairs described Mr Marriott’s conduct as “gratuitous, needless, offensive and disgusting”, although in sentencing the judge considered that there was “strong personal mitigation” due to the considerable steps Mr Marriott had taken to tackle his alcoholism following these events, including attending rehabilitation and refraining from drinking from July 2018.

In his mitigation, Mr Marriott said he felt “guilt, shame and remorse as a result of his actions and the impact they had on the paramedics”.

He said he had been an alcoholic for many years, “albeit one who was in denial”, and on the day the assaults were committed, he had drunk two bottles of wine before 8am and was attempting to travel so that he could sign on for Jobseekers’ Allowance.

“The respondent accepts that his drunken state was no excuse for his actions.”

The SDT said that, whilst the misconduct “may well have been initially spontaneous, it was repeated in respect of a second victim”.

It continued: “The tribunal was in no doubt that the Respondent’s misconduct had an extremely detrimental effect on both victims. The tribunal further concluded that the respondent’s misconduct had caused significant harm to the legal profession and undermined public trust in the same.”

It also found that he breached his duty to report his conviction to the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

The SDT accepted that this was “an isolated, albeit serious, event”, but concluded that “the misconduct was so serious that the protection of the public and the reputation of the legal profession required [Mr Marriott] to be struck off the roll of solicitors”.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Reports

Our latest special report, produced in association with Temple Legal Protection, looks at the role of after-the-event (ATE) insurance in commercial litigation post-LASPO. We are at a time when insurers, solicitors, clients and litigation funders work ever more closely to create funding packages that work for all of them, with conditional fee and even damages-based agreements now part of many law firms’ armoury.

Blog

16 September 2019

The Amazon effect

I have to be honest and say it still amazes me how many lawyers we come into contact with, who are still behaving like dinosaurs when it comes to technology. It’s not about chronological age.

Read More

Loading animation