AI tool aims to capture “invisible thinking” of lawyers


Jephson: Clients need to know what they are paying for

A legal tech startup led by a solicitor turned behavioural psychologist is aiming to capture the “invisible knowledge” of senior lawyers for the benefit of both junior lawyers and clients.

Wendy Jephson, chief executive of Let’s Think, said the startup had raised £800,000 from US and UK angel investors and from City law firm Kingsley Napley.

“In law firms there is a lot of judgement and a lot of decision-making that takes place in people’s heads – invisible thinking.

“When you’re really good at your job, you do a lot of thinking automatically, and you’re not always aware of it and you undervalue it.

“It means that people often don’t explain their thinking to clients or to the people they have to brief, whether it is trainees or other colleagues.

“All that complex thinking, the really valuable part, does not go into firm databases. It is what junior lawyers would pick up by being in the room, but they’re not in the room anymore.”

Ms Jephson said it was important for clients to know what they were paying for, with research showing that a fifth of legal fees were written off because clients did not understand them.

She qualified as a solicitor with City firm Richards Butler, which merged with US firm Reed Smith in 2007. After that she became an in-house lawyer with Xerox and then at US pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly.

Ms Jephson said that since she decided to switch from law to behavourial psychology 20 years ago, she had been “on a mission to improve human decision-making”.

When people came out of law school, the rules seemed “much more straightforward” than when you “enter an organisation and see the complexity of judgement and decision-making”.

Interested to “see how people made decisions and what influenced them”, she studied business psychology at the University of Surrey.

Having a “route into financial services” because her brother was a fund manager, she helped set up the fintech startup Sybenetix, which built behavioural science models to detect financial crime in asset management firms.

The company was bought by Nasdaq in 2017 for an undisclosed sum. After working for Nasdaq, Ms Jephson was thinking of another fintech startup when she met and discussed her ideas with Sarah Harris, director of innovation and knowledge at Kingsley Napley, who “just got it”.

Let’s Think was founded in 2022 by Ms Jephson, chief scientific officer Anna Leslie, a behavioural psychologist, and chief operating officer Clare Fisher. The three women are the firm’s owners. The fourth co-founder, chief technology officer Mike Unwin, joined in 2024.

The startup operates as a virtual firm, though it has been using Kingsley Napley’s offices for meetings. Ms Jephson said Let’s Think’s legal tech had been rolled out across the law firm.

She said the startup trained GenAI in its own behavioural science frameworks, so it could ask “the right questions” to get people thinking and extract “invisible thinking”.

The “manual version” required a lawyer to sit down with the AI tool for a couple of hours, but a faster version was designed for lawyers to “think with for five to 10 minutes”.

The output from these conversations was sent to the lawyers so they could review and refine it, or if necessary delete it. Ms Jephson said none of the data from these sessions would be used to train the AI.

“GenAI is very good at thinking for people. What we need is for people to think first. If we want people to get better at their jobs they need to think first before they go rushing off to find the answers.”

She added: “The biggest risk with legal AI isn’t that the technology won’t work, it’s that it will stop us from growing lawyers who can think.

“Firms that automate without re-engineering how juniors learn will quietly strangle the pipeline of future senior lawyers.”




    Readers Comments

  • Richard Loxton says:

    It is good to see a realistic approach to the use of AI by the legal profession, but this article exposes the neo-Luddite attitudes shown by most lawyers

  • Si says:

    IMO. They’re burning premium human fuel for low-octane output that needs constant babysitting. Photocopy of a photocopy. They’re treating AI like a fancy intranet for human anecdotes. “Capture the invisible thinking!” Cute, but wrong paradigm. AI’s superpower isn’t bottling senior vibes…. “Here’s my time and expertise distilled down so I can no longer command a significant fee earners rate given to juniors who either a) Should already be able to work this out or b) will never get it because experience is somewhat hard to come by these days.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


The SRA’s 2025 AML report: What law firms need to know

The SRA has released its 2024-25 anti-money laundering report and the scale of supervision is striking – it carried out 935 proactive engagements in the year to 5 April 2025.


The managing partner in 2026: skills, security and strategic technology

The legal sector stands at a pivotal moment. The pace of technological change is accelerating, cyber threats are becoming more sophisticated, and client expectations are higher than ever.


Santa’s Costa Living Crisis

It’s almost 25 December, so it must be time for the annual Christmas blog from Nigel Wallis, consultant solicitor at O’Connors Legal Services.


Loading animation