Admiral reveals ownership stake in joint venture ABSs

Print This Post

6 March 2014


Engelhardt: the year of the baked potato

Admiral Group is the overwhelmingly dominant partner in the joint venture alternative business structures (ABSs) it has set up with law firms Lyons Davidson and Cordner Lewis, the insurer’s annual results have shown.

The company has also lost more than £12m from the ban on solicitors paying referral fees.

Last year Admiral formed Admiral Law with Lyons Davidson and BDE Law with Cordner Lewis. Yesterday’s announcement said Admiral owns 90% of the joint ventures.

“Bringing the provision of legal services into the group will allow Admiral to administer a claim throughout the process and offer a materially better quality of service,” it said. “New and proposed reforms to the handling of bodily injury claims mean that the businesses are not expected to make a material contribution to group profits in the foreseeable future.”

Admiral insures 3.02m vehicles and the results said the referral fee ban reduced Admiral’s revenue per vehicle by £4. However, “Admiral expects this reduction in revenue will be offset by reductions in claims costs”. Last week Direct Line said the ban had cost it around £14m last year, which should increase to £21m for this full year.

The impact of a potential ban on credit hire referral fees – resulting from the Competition Commission’s review of the car insurance market – should be similarly balanced, it said.

“Admiral welcomes action aimed at curbing the compensation culture that currently exists in the UK motor insurance market. A potential outcome of the review is regulatory change resulting in a reduction or elimination of credit hire referral fees and a reduction in associated claims costs.

“Admiral expects any such reduction in revenue from credit hire referral fees would be offset by reductions in claims costs. In 2013, Admiral earned £14m in credit hire referral fees.”

Overall Admiral reported an 8% fall in turnover to £2.03bn, but 7% rise in profits to £370m. Henry Engelhardt, group chief executive officer, described 2013 as “the year of the baked potato”.

He explained: “It was a good, solid year, something on the plate that is appreciated but doesn’t really grab the spotlight. This is a comfort food set of results.”

 

Tags: , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

How best to achieve independent regulation under the Legal Services Act?

Craig Wakeford LSB

Independent regulation gives confidence to consumers, providers, investors and society as a whole that legal services work in the public interest and support the rule of law. The Legal Services Act 2007 does not require all approved regulators to be structurally separate from representative bodies. Instead, the Legal Services Board is required by the Act to produce internal governance rules (IGR) which apply the principle of regulatory independence in legal service regulation. We are currently running a consultation on the IGR which continues until 9 February.

January 19th, 2018