Accountants attack bid to pull them into regulatory net for will-writing and estate work


Davies: powerful consensus of support for this move

Accountants should be excluded from Legal Services Board (LSB) plans to reserve will-writing and estate administration, their professional body has argued.

Michael Izza, chief executive of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, criticised the LSB for not taking “a hard enough look at work already done by accountants in this area”.

Responding to yesterday’s announcement of the next steps in making will-writing and estate administration reserved legal activities, Mr Izza said: “In our experience, and judging by the very small number of complaints we have had in this area over the years, our members act with integrity and in the best interest of their clients when dealing with estate administration and will writing.

“Our preferred solution is to use existing regulatory frameworks for oversight of will-writing and estate administration.”

Mr Izza acknowledged that if the LSB’s recommendations are accepted, the ICAEW will need to becoming a licensing authority so that its members can continue to do this work “with the least possible extra regulation”; it is currently consulting on plans to become a licensing authority for reserved probate work.

“We will continue to work with LSB, hopefully to prevent the need for additional licensing, but also to put any necessary arrangements in place,” he said.

Meanwhile, the Law Society welcomed the announcement, but was unable to say whether it will allow the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to extend its regulatory reach to include will-writers.

The SRA said in April that it would like to regulate will-writers, but it needs the Law Society council to agree. The society said it will need to consider the matter in detail.

More broadly, Law Society president Lucy Scott Moncrieff said: “We urge the LSB and government to proceed swiftly to ensure that in will writing, estate administration and probate, consumers are protected from bad advice and untrained providers.”

Elisabeth Davies, chair of the Legal Services Consumer Panel, said she was delighted that the LSB has listened to the evidence of poor standards in will-writing and sales practices that its work had uncovered. “There’s a powerful consensus of support for this move and it’s striking how representatives of consumer groups, charities, solicitors and will-writing businesses are all convinced that regulation is needed. The message is clear – consumers are already suffering and the LSB’s proposals need to be acted on without any delay.”

In a statement, the Society of Will Writers also supported the move, saying: “The regulation of the sector will give all providers of these services a level playing field. This will be welcomed by professional will writers who offer a good service to their clients but have been unable to gain the respect they deserve.”

 

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


Legal project management – a mindset lawyers can easily apply

Where budgets are tight, lawyers will be considering what’s in their existing arsenal to still improve productivity. One effective, accessible and cheap tool is legal project management.


How a good customer journey can put your business on the map

Good customer service should be a priority for any business and, if you want to stay ahead of the competition, something that’s constantly under review.


The CAT’s welcome boost for the funding industry

There was welcome guidance from the Competition Appeal Tribunal this week for funded cases looking for certainty following PACCAR, with the renegotiated Sony litigation funding agreement upheld as lawful.


Loading animation