Compliance & Regulation


Spike in scam trade mark emails using names of real solicitors

22 December 2025

There has been a rise in “highly convincing” scam emails targeting businesses and trade mark owners that use the names of genuine solicitors, a leading law firm has warned.


Employer confidence in SQE on the rise but slumps among students

19 December 2025

Confidence in the SQE among employers has risen over the past three years but is still not particularly strong – and declined significantly among candidates.


Compliance officer banned after lying about being in office

18 December 2025

A compliance officer at a City law firm who pretended he was at work when he was actually working from home – and continued to lie about it – has been banned from the profession.


CLC and consumer panel back radical review of Legal Ombudsman

18 December 2025

The Council for Licensed Conveyancers and Legal Services Consumer Panel have both backed a radical review of the Legal Ombudsman and possibly a complete redesign of the scheme.


Suspended suspension for “manifestly incompetent” solicitor

17 December 2025

A “manifestly incompetent” solicitor who facilitated one fraudulent and three potentially fraudulent property transactions has been given a suspended suspension.


Law Society tells LeO: Focus on performance, not reform

17 December 2025

The Law Society is urging the Legal Ombudsman not to launch a fundamental review of its rules when it should be focusing on reducing its backlog of cases.


Compliance officers have “poor” knowledge of obligations

16 December 2025

Law firm compliance officers have “poor” knowledge of the SRA reporting and record-keeping requirements, according to research by the regulator.


Managing partner “did not instigate” drunken kiss with paralegal

16 December 2025

The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal has rejected an allegation that a managing partner instigated a non-consensual drunken kiss with a much younger paralegal.


Law Society applies to intervene in Mazur appeal

16 December 2025

The Law Society is to seek to intervene in the Mazur appeal amid specialist lawyers’ prediction that more costs disputes are on the way following the High Court decision.


Solicitor without PC took money for work he never did

15 December 2025

A solicitor who deceived a convicted client into believing he had a practising certificate, took money to pursue an appeal and then did not do the work has been struck off.


SRA fails with two high-profile SLAPPs prosecutions

15 December 2025

Two high-profile Solicitors Regulation Authority prosecutions for alleged misconduct by libel lawyers failed last week.


SRA disqualifies “dishonest” non-solicitor directors of SSB Group

12 December 2025

Two non-solicitor directors of SSB Group have been disqualified from working in the profession after the Solicitors Regulation Authority found they had been dishonest.


MP: Moving lawyers’ AML oversight to FCA “will help fraud fight”

12 December 2025

Moving the supervision of lawyers’ anti-money laundering activities to the Financial Conduct Authority will strengthen the fight against fraud, a campaigning MP has told Legal Futures.


SRA urges target firms in acquisitions not to ignore due diligence

12 December 2025

An SRA review of law firm acquisitions has highlighted failures and behaviours on the part of some target firms as a cause for concern.


SRA targets accountant’s reports and sole owners in shake-up

11 December 2025

All law firm accountant’s reports will have to be submitted to the SRA in future, and sole owners will not generally be allowed to hold compliance roles too, under proposals published today.

← Page 26 Page 27 of 182 Page 28 →

Blog


The AI governance gap in law firms and why it matters now

A third of law firms are already using AI tools with no formal policy in place to govern how AI gets used, what data goes into it, or who’s accountable when something goes wrong.


Information isn’t oversight – lessons from the PM Law review

The PM Law review’s real findings perhaps point to a failure mode applying to any organisation sitting on scattered risk information.


AI can do the work but it cannot inherit the lawyer’s duty

What happens when lawyers delegate cognitive work to AI but remain personally responsible for judgements they may no longer have independently reasoned through?