Compliance & Regulation


Legal Services Board formally issues SRA with censure over SSB

5 March 2026

The Legal Services Board has today finally issued the formal public censure of the SRA for its failure to protect consumers affected by the collapse of SSB Group.


Mazur: Court refuses CILEX Fellow exemption to conduct litigation

5 March 2026

A circuit judge has refused to grant a highly experienced chartered legal executive an exemption that would allow her to conduct a family law case.


SRA shuts down eight-office Home Counties law firm

5 March 2026

An eight-office Home Counties law firm – operating under seven different names – was closed down yesterday by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.


Regulators told to be tougher with AML disciplinary action

4 March 2026

Some legal and accountancy regulators are not undertaking “sufficiently dissuasive disciplinary measures” over non-compliance with AML rules, their oversight body has warned.


Dual-qualified barrister who misled High Court is disbarred

4 March 2026

A Bar disciplinary tribunal has ordered that a dual-qualified barrister, who misled the High Court as a solicitor, should be disbarred.


Exclusive: Ex-SSB clients settle claims against firm’s insurer

3 March 2026

Around 130 former clients of SSB Law have settled their negligence claims against the collapsed law firm’s insurer, their solicitor has revealed.


Fine for solicitor who failed to act on client’s vulnerabilities

3 March 2026

An experienced solicitor who failed to take action after medical reports showed his client had not been fit to plead guilty to 19 criminal charges has been fined £3,800.


Don’t make us responsible for submitting reports, accountants tell SRA

3 March 2026

Responsibility for submitting law firms’ accountant’s reports should not be switched to the accountants, a leading representative body has told the SRA.


Court of Appeal refuses bid by jailed barrister to call new evidence

2 March 2026

A barrister has failed in a bid to overturn his conviction for defrauding the Legal Aid Agency by falsely claiming defence legal costs.


Suspension for solicitor who ran firm without authorisation

2 March 2026

A solicitor who practised as a sole practitioner for over three years without authorisation after her partner left has been suspended for nine months.


Ethical working cultures “vital” for law firms, indemnity insurer says

27 February 2026

An “ethical and supportive working culture” has become “not just beneficial, but vital” to the future of law firms, a leading professional indemnity insurer has said.


Solicitor struck off for misleading judge about location

27 February 2026

A solicitor who “wasted valuable court time” by telling a recorder that he was in London when he was actually in Munich has been struck off.


Client account interest scheme “could create meaningful change”

26 February 2026

An Interest on Lawyers’ Client Accounts scheme “could create meaningful change” by delivering a justice system that works for more people.


Training of lawyers “not good enough”, MPs told

25 February 2026

The training of lawyers in England and Wales, both at law schools and through CPD, “is not good enough” and could be improved by regulation, a leading legal academic has told MPs.


Non-AI technology-only law firm authorised by SRA

24 February 2026

A technology-only law firm built around a “fully deterministic legal model” has been authorised by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, the first of its kind.

← Page 19 Page 20 of 182 Page 21 →

Blog


The AI governance gap in law firms and why it matters now

A third of law firms are already using AI tools with no formal policy in place to govern how AI gets used, what data goes into it, or who’s accountable when something goes wrong.


Information isn’t oversight – lessons from the PM Law review

The PM Law review’s real findings perhaps point to a failure mode applying to any organisation sitting on scattered risk information.


AI can do the work but it cannot inherit the lawyer’s duty

What happens when lawyers delegate cognitive work to AI but remain personally responsible for judgements they may no longer have independently reasoned through?