Compliance & Regulation


FCA claims market review to focus on financial services and housing

22 May 2026

The Financial Conduct Authority’s review of the claims management market will focus on financial services and products, and housing disrepair, it has announced.


Solicitor struck off for asking client to pay fees into his bank account

21 May 2026

A criminal defence solicitor who asked a client to pay his law firm’s fees into his personal bank account has been struck off for dishonesty.


Barrister fined for accusing senior judge of misconduct loses appeal

20 May 2026

The High Court has dismissed an appeal by a barrister fined £15,000 for making an “unfounded and serious allegation of misconduct in public office” against a senior judge.


New approach to client complaints may be needed in age of AI

20 May 2026

Existing approaches to legal services complaints handling “might not be suited to the challenges posed” by the age of AI, the Law Society has warned.


LeO directs law firm to pay £49k in latest public interest decisions

19 May 2026

The Legal Ombudsman directed London law firm Laytons to pay £49,000 in compensation to a client for failing to register her lease extension in the latest batch of public interest decisions.


Sports solicitor fails in challenge to SRA intervention

19 May 2026

A High Court judge has rejected a high-profile sports lawyer’s challenge to an intervention in his law firm by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.


SRA highlights spike in conduct complaints amid “outsourcing ruse”

18 May 2026

Misconduct reports about solicitors have risen 27% in the past year – and 58% over two years – the Solicitors Regulation Authority has revealed.


Financial Services Bill will be vehicle for AML switch to FCA

15 May 2026

The government is set to legislate to transfer the anti-money laundering supervision of lawyers to the Financial Conduct Authority, it has emerged.


Judge refers solicitors to SRA for fake AI-generated cases

15 May 2026

A circuit judge has referred two solicitors to the Solicitors Regulation Authority for submitting hallucinated cases to the court.


“Significant new evidence” in employment judge misconduct case

15 May 2026

The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office has agreed to reinvestigate allegations of bullying and intimidation against Employment Judge Philip Lancaster, in light of “significant new evidence”.


Tribunal clears law clinic solicitor of trying to mislead employer

14 May 2026

An immigration solicitor has been cleared of misleading her employer over her conduct of an asylum case after a three-day Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal hearing.


King’s Speech: No litigation funding, SLAPPs or AML reform

14 May 2026

The King’s Speech yesterday was notable as much for what was not in it as what was, with significant omissions including the promised litigation funding bill.


Barrister who put client’s interests ahead of duty to court disbarred

13 May 2026

A barrister who knowingly allowed a judge and opposing party in a family law case to be misled during a hearing has been disbarred for “professional dishonesty”.


Ban for male employee who targeted firm’s young female staff

13 May 2026

A facilities assistant at a law firm who targeted young female staff with “inappropriate” gifts and messages has been barred from working in the profession.


CA overturns referral of KC for contempt hearing over closing speech

12 May 2026

The Court of Appeal has set aside a Crown Court judge’s referral of a KC for contempt of court proceedings after finding the High Court did not have the jurisdiction to pursue them.

← Page 12 Page 13 of 182 Page 14 →

Blog


The AI governance gap in law firms and why it matters now

A third of law firms are already using AI tools with no formal policy in place to govern how AI gets used, what data goes into it, or who’s accountable when something goes wrong.


Information isn’t oversight – lessons from the PM Law review

The PM Law review’s real findings perhaps point to a failure mode applying to any organisation sitting on scattered risk information.


AI can do the work but it cannot inherit the lawyer’s duty

What happens when lawyers delegate cognitive work to AI but remain personally responsible for judgements they may no longer have independently reasoned through?