Regulation


PI solicitor who put work referrers ahead of clients struck off

14 November 2016

A personal injury solicitor who put his relationship with work referrers ahead of his duties to the clients they passed on to him has been struck off. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal found one instance where he paid a client’s damages to a referrer without authority “extraordinary”.


High Court: Time to consider lowering burden of proof in the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal

11 November 2016

It is time to consider lowering the burden of proof used by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal from the criminal to the civil standard, Sir Brian Leveson, the president of the Queen’s Bench Division has said. The case saw the tribunal criticised for using the criminal standard to overturn a decision made by the SRA on the civil standard.


Senior partner accepts fine for firm’s work on SDLT avoidance schemes

11 November 2016

A senior partner whose firm’s involvement in stamp duty land tax avoidance schemes brought in £52,000 in fees – but cost the taxman at least £3m – has accepted a £1,500 fine. He failed to ensure the disclosure of material information to lender clients, and allowed the firm to act where there were conflicts of interest.


Barristers face decade of higher practising fees to plug Bar Council pension fund hole

11 November 2016

Barristers are set to pay 10% extra for their practising certificates for the next decade, first to plug a multi-million pound hole in the Bar Council’s pension fund and then to buy it out and remove all future liabilities.


Lawyers in hot water over tax troubles

8 November 2016

A solicitor in debt to HM Revenue & Customs who supplied legal services without complying with a condition that he had first to give the taxman security for the VAT, has been rebuked by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.


Solicitor who forged bank statements and QC’s opinion struck off

7 November 2016

A solicitor has been struck off after taking hundreds of thousands of pounds in client money and covering his tracks by forging a host of documents – from bank statements to building regulations certificates – and also falsifying leading counsel’s opinion.


Rebukes for solicitors who used legal aid cash to cover their overheads

7 November 2016

Three solicitors who used legal aid money meant to pay for disbursements to cover their firm’s overheads have been rebuked by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Meanwhile, the regulator has made orders against non-solicitors who stole money and stationery from their firms.


Suspension and public access ban for ‘named and shamed’ barrister

4 November 2016

The first and only lawyer to be ‘named and shamed’ by the Legal Ombudsman has been suspended from practice at the Bar for 14 months. Tariq Rehman was also prohibited from accepting or carrying out public access instructions for three years.


Client-care letters “failing” consumers, research finds

3 November 2016

Many client-care letters get the lawyer/client relationship off on the wrong foot, reinforcing preconceptions of lawyers’ letters as complex and difficult to read, and not providing the information that consumers actually want, new research has found.


Solicitor who sent offensive SEN tweets accepts rebuke

2 November 2016

The solicitor who caused an uproar in June when he sent out a series of tweets appearing to gloat over defeating cases brought by parents of children with special educational needs and disability, has accepted a rebuke from the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

← Older posts Page 199 of 397 Newer posts →

Blog


How unstoppable AI is reshaping UK legal practice

At a time when most technology innovation still flows from the US and China, UK lawtech is attracting growing international attention and capital.


Modern vehicles: new injury profiles and new legal challenges

As the number of electric vehicles on UK roads continues to grow year-on-year, it is important to address the risks that come with their increased adoption.


The SRA needs to admit it got it wrong about SLAPPs

The High Court judgment in Ashley Hurst v SRA in January raises serious questions about the regulator’s approach to allegations of SLAPP-like behaviour.


Loading animation