How not to bury bad news

Posted by Louise Restell, head of public and legal affairs at Legal Futures Associate Russell Jones & Walker

Restell: Tesco would be out of business if a quarter of its customers were unhappy with its service

I’m not sure how the Law Society Gazette was hoping to reassure solicitors with its recent story “Consumers unattracted by non-legal brands”.  The headline may sound promising, but as the statistics unfold it becomes quite clear this was not a good news story for the legal profession.

The poll, by law firm referral service Contact Law, found that 66% of consumers said they would not be happy to buy legal services through non-legal brands… but did it ask what type of legal services? There is a big difference between, say, needing a straightforward will and contesting probate. I am a big fan of ‘consumerising’ legal services, but I would not necessarily want to have a complicated and sensitive transaction carried out by Tesco. I’d be happy to get my will from them though.

But this isn’t really bad news, more misleading information. The Gazette tried to hide the really bad news further on and dress it up with smiley language. Apparently clients were ‘broadly satisfied’ with solicitors’ costs, with 59% (yes 59%!) saying their most recent lawyers’ fees were justified. This is just bananas. If any other business had only a 59% satisfaction rating on price, including Tesco, it would go out of business.

The survey is just as damning about service levels. The Gazette happily highlights how service is more important than price when choosing legal services (84% of consumers say so) but then goes on to report that a quarter of respondents said they were dissatisfied with the service they received from their lawyer. A quarter! Shocking – again, Tesco would be out of business if a quarter of its customers were unhappy with its service. And, even more depressing, this would appear to be worse than the one in six dissatisfied with their solicitor’s service that Which? found in 2005.

To be fair, the analysis given by Contact Law director Dan Watkins at the foot of the article does put the figures in perspective, but this only partially clouds the sunny picture painted by the Gazette. It seems to me that this does a disservice to solicitors by telling them that it’s going to be alright, because it won’t be.

It’s probably fair to say that not so many years ago, consumers would have said they wouldn’t want to get a loan from Tesco or manage their bank account online, but they do now. So I don’t think we should read too much into their apparent reluctance to get their legal services that way.


    Readers Comments

  • It’s easy to be satisfied with the outcome after buying a loaf of bread, not so easy after a bitterly contested matrimonial.

    The LG article only reflects the LS’s complacency and ineffectiveness in the face of a serious commercial challenge. No change there then……….

    Some thoughts on local court closure

  • V interesting. I agree these are pretty bad figures: if “Consumers were generally pleased with the service they received from their solicitor, with a third of those polled giving their lawyer the top rating for service, and a further 18% giving the next highest rating on the scale.” That probably means only 51% were satisfied. That’s a pretty bad figure for this kind of survey. I’d expect it to be upwards of 70%. A good figure would be 80%ish

Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Loading animation