How not to bury bad news

Print This Post

16 December 2010

Posted by Louise Restell, head of public and legal affairs at Legal Futures Associate Russell Jones & Walker

Restell: Tesco would be out of business if a quarter of its customers were unhappy with its service

I’m not sure how the Law Society Gazette was hoping to reassure solicitors with its recent story “Consumers unattracted by non-legal brands”.  The headline may sound promising, but as the statistics unfold it becomes quite clear this was not a good news story for the legal profession.

The poll, by law firm referral service Contact Law, found that 66% of consumers said they would not be happy to buy legal services through non-legal brands… but did it ask what type of legal services? There is a big difference between, say, needing a straightforward will and contesting probate. I am a big fan of ‘consumerising’ legal services, but I would not necessarily want to have a complicated and sensitive transaction carried out by Tesco. I’d be happy to get my will from them though.

But this isn’t really bad news, more misleading information. The Gazette tried to hide the really bad news further on and dress it up with smiley language. Apparently clients were ‘broadly satisfied’ with solicitors’ costs, with 59% (yes 59%!) saying their most recent lawyers’ fees were justified. This is just bananas. If any other business had only a 59% satisfaction rating on price, including Tesco, it would go out of business.

The survey is just as damning about service levels. The Gazette happily highlights how service is more important than price when choosing legal services (84% of consumers say so) but then goes on to report that a quarter of respondents said they were dissatisfied with the service they received from their lawyer. A quarter! Shocking – again, Tesco would be out of business if a quarter of its customers were unhappy with its service. And, even more depressing, this would appear to be worse than the one in six dissatisfied with their solicitor’s service that Which? found in 2005.

To be fair, the analysis given by Contact Law director Dan Watkins at the foot of the article does put the figures in perspective, but this only partially clouds the sunny picture painted by the Gazette. It seems to me that this does a disservice to solicitors by telling them that it’s going to be alright, because it won’t be.

It’s probably fair to say that not so many years ago, consumers would have said they wouldn’t want to get a loan from Tesco or manage their bank account online, but they do now. So I don’t think we should read too much into their apparent reluctance to get their legal services that way.

Tags: ,

2 Responses to “How not to bury bad news”

  1. It’s easy to be satisfied with the outcome after buying a loaf of bread, not so easy after a bitterly contested matrimonial.

    The LG article only reflects the LS’s complacency and ineffectiveness in the face of a serious commercial challenge. No change there then……….

    Some thoughts on local court closure

  2. Paul Anthony Murden on December 16th, 2010 at 10:43 pm
  3. V interesting. I agree these are pretty bad figures: if “Consumers were generally pleased with the service they received from their solicitor, with a third of those polled giving their lawyer the top rating for service, and a further 18% giving the next highest rating on the scale.” That probably means only 51% were satisfied. That’s a pretty bad figure for this kind of survey. I’d expect it to be upwards of 70%. A good figure would be 80%ish

  4. Richard Moorhead on December 18th, 2010 at 8:37 am

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Don’t get caught out by the traditional equity partnership model

David Beech 2

It’s no secret that these are challenging times for some of the UK law sector as it tries to keep up with emerging digital trends and increasing demand from clients. But there is buoyancy in the market and opportunities for those businesses that are agile and brave enough to challenge the status quo – the traditional equity partnership model. We’ve seen it all too often where partners have been duped into putting their assets against a failing business that is riddled with debt. We’ve even received calls from partners to discuss bankruptcy and that the possibility of moving house is no longer possible, due to the LLP they joined going into liquidation.

March 22nd, 2018