New name for Litigation Costs Services as it develops ‘Jackson compliant’ costs software

Print This Post

3 May 2012


On 1 May Litigation Costs Services, the first costs drafting firm to be a Legal Futures Associate, celebrated its tenth anniversary with a reception held at the RAF Club in Piccadilly.

The guest list included various people connected with the firm over the years, as well as a number of well-known costs specialists including leading counsel and Master Andrew Gordon-Saker from the Senior Courts Costs Office.

Litigation Costs Services has evolved from the established niche costs firm of Group Litigation Costs Services (GLCS), which was launched on 1 May 2002 by Terry Wisdom, a founding member of the Association of Law Costs Draftsmen (now Association of Costs Lawyers) and Sue Nash, a costs draftsman/lawyer well known for her group litigation expertise.

The company’s re-branding as Litigation Costs Services reflects the firm’s expansion over the last few years into all areas of law costs drafting and consultancy.

As for the future, the firm is still growing and sees huge opportunities for costs professionals in the post-Jackson world. We are determined to keep abreast of (if not one step ahead of) the changes to the legal costs landscape, many of which are due to take effect from April 2013.

As part of this process we are developing costs software that will be fully ‘Jackson compliant’, enabling the production of costs budgets, costs schedules and bills of costs as outlined by Lord Justice Jackson in paragraphs 5.3-5.8 of chapter 45 of his final report. Extended services for litigants in person (now to be known as self-represented litigants) – including alternative dispute resolution – are also being looked at as are collaborations with other legal professionals.

We are always interested in talking to other forward thinking people and organisations – contact Sue Nash at sue@litigation-costs.co.uk

 



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

How best to achieve independent regulation under the Legal Services Act?

Craig Wakeford LSB

Independent regulation gives confidence to consumers, providers, investors and society as a whole that legal services work in the public interest and support the rule of law. The Legal Services Act 2007 does not require all approved regulators to be structurally separate from representative bodies. Instead, the Legal Services Board is required by the Act to produce internal governance rules (IGR) which apply the principle of regulatory independence in legal service regulation. We are currently running a consultation on the IGR which continues until 9 February.

January 19th, 2018