Home Condition Survey – A quick and cost effective survey for your clients

Print This Post

13 March 2015


Basic CMYKFACT: More than 70% of homebuyers do not commission an independent survey on the property they purchase. The main reason for this is that 80% of mortgage borrowers think their lenders valuation is a survey – which of course it is not!

According to a WHICH? Report, consumers who have their property surveyed save an average £2,000 on the property price.

What is the Home Condition Survey?

The Home Condition Survey (HCS) has been developed exclusively with homebuyers and their conveyancers in mind and offers comprehensive benefits that other surveys simply do not offer.

The survey provides a clear and concise report allowing the homebuyer to make an informed decision about the property they are buying.

Features & benefits for you

  • Refer the client directly to us – we will take care of the rest.
  • The professional indemnity insurance is attached to the survey which is logged electronically meaning NO risk to you and easy access to the report.

Why recommend a Home Condition Survey to your client?

Once carried out, each survey is completed and returned to the client within 48 hours.

  • Every HCS comes with 30 minutes of telephone consultancy on completion
  • The cost of a Home Condition Survey pays for itself – the value of being able to talk to an expert about any issues could save you thousands
  • The survey details any visible internal and external problems with the property.

To order a Home Condition Survey please ask your client to contact Jason Alexanian directly who will be happy to assist.



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate



Legal Futures Blog

Court modernisation: Court Service spins response to NAO report

Roger Smith

After months of debate on the court modernisation programme led by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service, we now have an authoritative analysis from the National Audit Office. HMCTS chief executive Susan Acland-Hood professed herself happy. The report was “helpful and constructive”. She was pleased that “the NAO acknowledges our ‘early progress’”. Her comments were more reflective of spin than the span of the NAO report. The NAO acknowledges the ambitious nature of the reform. But comments like “HMCTS’s change portfolio presents a very significant challenge” need minimal decoding to reveal a bit of concern.

May 17th, 2018