ETSOS publishes searching truth on compliance

Print This Post

9 July 2012


Online search supermarket and conveyancing technology specialist, ETSOS, has published some useful guidance on how its ordering and quotation and referral systems can help conveyancers meet their compliance obligations.

Prepared by independent compliance consultant Michaela Hardwick, the advice note details the specific mandatory principles and outcomes within the SRA Handbook that ETSOS and its solutions automatically address. These range from ensuring firms ‘provide a proper standard of service’ and preventing ‘one’s independence to be compromised’ to having systems in place to monitor risk and to be compliant in relation to outsourcing agreements.

Phil Natusch, ETSOS’s managing director, explains why they have chosen to publish this advice now. “Post October 2011 and the introduction of Outcomes Focused Regulation (OFR) there’s been a growing interest in all things risk and compliance related. Conveyancing is not immune and more and more we’re hearing from firms, some on panels, some not, who are concerned that their reliance on a single search provider may give them issues in this respect. What we’re trying to highlight is that the ETSOS ‘search supermarket’ concept gives them an inherently compliant alternative – here market oversight is afforded by breadth and clarity of choice, consistent standards and processes are embedded in the ordering portal, and quality assurance is a by-product of our own due diligence on all our providers.”

The guidance paper can be viewed here



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate

Tags: , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

How to make a case to the unconverted

Jonathan Whittle

The prospect of change is a daunting one, whether you’re a global firm or a small one. You might think that your firm’s working practices are fine, or that there’s no value in altering the way you do things because of the disruption it would cause. You might even see the benefits of using a different methodology, but still refuse to put the effort in to implement it – and you wouldn’t be alone. From our research in the 2016 report, The Riddle of Perception, we know that 73% of lawyers believe that adapting to change is not where their strength lies. However, it’s no longer optional.

November 16th, 2017