DAS welcomes MOJ decision not to raise the small claims court limit

Print This Post

23 October 2013


Commenting on the MOJ response to the injury consultation released today, Kathryn Mortimer, DAS Group Head of Legal and Managing Director of DAS Law said: “We had serious concerns that a rise in the small claims court limit, and the non-recoverability of legal costs within it, would have led to an environment where genuine claimants would have severe difficulty in finding a solicitor to take on their case.

“We are delighted that the Government has heeded the advice of the Transport Select Committee and decided not to raise the limit. DAS Group is committed to assisting people with their legitimate legal claims through their legal expenses insurance and as clients of DAS Law. This news removes the uncertainty for all parties, in a rapidly changing legal environment, following the introduction of LASPO earlier in the year.

“Whilst the details of the medical panels are still to be determined, we are in favour of measures to tackle fraud and reduce motor premiums that ensure genuinely injured people continue to be able to seek the compensation they need.”



Associate News is provided by Legal Futures Associates.
Find out about becoming an Associate



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms and Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Legal Futures Blog

Check your retainers – the lessons of Dreamvar

Jerome OSullivan

Solicitors, and their insurers, dealing with property transactions should look closely at their due diligence procedures following last week’s landmark ruling on liabilities from the Court of Appeal. It is clearly good news for buyers who are victims of identity fraud. Dreamvar UK Ltd v Mishcon de Reya & Mary Monson Solicitors also has implications for anyone holding monies in a client account for a transaction. The ruling is likely to lead to increased professional indemnity insurance premiums for solicitors engaged in property transactions. They should review the terms and conditions of their retainers in light of this ruling.

May 22nd, 2018