By Legal Futures Associate Miller Insurance [1]
The recent UnConference event at Miller’s London offices (run by E3 Compliance Training’s Compliance Collective) set out to inform risk and compliance professionals concerned about the likely move to FCA regulation of anti-money laundering.
With a range of experts in the room, the event addressed the FCA’s approach to AML inspection, dual regulation risks, and how to start preparing for the change in regulator.
FCA’s approach to AML regulation
We can expect the FCA to take a much more data-driven approach than other professions regulators (such as the SRA) currently take. Firms will likely have to submit a larger and more specific set of data than they do at present, with absolute deadlines for submission.
Data sets the FCA will collect could include:
- Number of transactions by type in period, both opened and completed
- Financial values
- The number of high-risk jurisdiction clients and transactions
- The total number of clients you have completed AML checks for in the year (and details of how many of those required enhanced due diligence and how many were ‘fails’)
- Source of funds data
- The number of sanctions matches and false positives
Based on its current approach, we can expect that the FCA will require all data fields to be completed to enable submission. Gaps in data, and guesswork, are liable to lead to regulatory censure. ‘If it isn’t recorded, it didn’t happen’.
As long as data submissions are timely, accurate and complete, and do not flag particular concerns, professional firms may have less interaction with their regulator than they currently do. With its data led approach, much of the FCA’s actions are driven through coordinated, thematic reviews.
The FCA has a very structured approach to guiding firms. The handbook is large but structured, to help firms see what applies for their permissions, with updates being recorded so the chronology of changes is easy to understand. The guidance provided by the FCA is typically viewed as clearer, more consistent and more prescriptive than some others.