- Legal Futures - https://www.legalfutures.co.uk -

Advising on restrictive covenants in residential transactions: In conversation with Ian Quayle

InfoTrack logoBy Legal Futures Associate InfoTrack [1]

Restrictive covenants remain one of the trickiest aspects of residential conveyancing. These binding promises can dictate what owners may or may not do with their land and frequently surface during title investigations.

A recent webinar with Ian Quayle, Managing Director of IQ Legal Training, and Rosella Lanza, Content Analyst at InfoTrack, explored the complexities of restrictive covenants and offered practical guidance for solicitors. The session focused on how to identify, advise on, and manage these issues within residential transactions, and is now available to watch on demand [2].

What are restrictive covenants in residential conveyancing?

Restrictive covenants are contractual obligations that limit land use. Although originally agreed between contracting parties, they often continue to bind successors in title. This makes them a critical due diligence requirement for conveyancers, who must:

The key challenge is aligning these legal considerations with the client’s objectives. A seemingly straightforward nuisance covenant, for example, may in practice restrict building works or extensions.

Are restrictive covenants enforceable? Key legal considerations

Enforceability: Restrictive covenants generally bind successors only if they are negative in nature. They may not be upheld if they are personal, fail to benefit identifiable land, or are anti-competitive.

Protection: For unregistered land, restrictive covenants must be protected by a Class D(ii) land charge. On registered land, they appear as notices in the charges register, although registration alone does not guarantee enforceability.

Remedies: Breaches can give rise to injunctions, damages, or in some cases, demolition orders.

Variation or Removal: Section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 allows application to the Upper Tribunal to discharge or modify covenants if they are obsolete, contrary to public interest, or provide no substantial practical benefit.

Practical advice for conveyancers

Solicitors advising on restrictive covenants should:

Recent cases, Nottingham Patent Brick & Tile Co v Butler (1886), Clincare Ltd v Orchard Homes (2004), and First Tower Trustees Ltd v CDS (Superstores International) Ltd (2018), highlight how courts deal with modern disputes and conveyancing risks, particularly where covenants or representations become outdated or unsupported by proper verification.

How technology simplifies restrictive Covenant reporting

Beyond legal interpretation, the practical challenge for conveyancers lies in efficiently reporting on restrictive covenants and related issues. Manual reporting can be time-consuming and risks important details being overlooked.

InfoTrack’s Property Report helps firms address this challenge by automating key parts of the reporting process:

By streamlining covenant reporting, Property Report reduces administrative burden, minimises the risk of oversight, and supports solicitors in delivering timely, accurate advice.

Conclusion

Restrictive covenants remain a source of complexity in residential transactions, requiring solicitors to balance legal expertise with practical client advice. Conveyancers must identify enforceability, evaluate client risk, and provide practical advice to ensure risks are properly managed.

Technology now plays a vital role in this process. Tools like Property Report automate the extraction and reporting of covenants, alongside easements, rentcharges, and permissions,  giving conveyancers the confidence to deliver accurate property reports quickly and consistently.

To learn more about how Property Report can help your firm, download InfoTrack’s brochure [3] today.