Negligence claims pile up against collapsed law firm


Kurtz: Loss of opportunity

National law firm Hugh James is acting for former clients of Sandstone Legal, which specialised in financial mis-selling claims, over potential professional negligence action.

It appeared that “a number of clients” had Plevin claims with real prospects of success that have now become “time-barred or otherwise prejudiced whilst they were with Sandstone Legal”.

This could mean negligence claims against its insurer for loss of opportunity.

Plevin claims concerned undisclosed commissions in the sale of payment protection insurance –

The now-defunct Manchester-based firm encountered significant financial and operational difficulties during late 2024 and early 2025.

Last year, a judge strongly criticised Sandstone’s boss, Andrew Settle, for giving false evidence and trying to force through a prepack administration sale in favour of his own newly incorporated company. He denied misleading the court.

Instead, Sandstone’s caseload was transferred to four law firms and its other assets sold to a litigation funder.

Hugh James said: “While those events are distinct from the merits of individual claims, they coincide with widespread concerns from former clients about delays, lack of progression, and missed opportunities to pursue claims.”

It is acting for clients whose claims became time-barred while with Sandstone Legal, or were otherwise affected by delays, inactivity, or lack of advice, and clients whose files were transferred mid-claim with no meaningful progression.

Partner Erich Kurtz said: “We are already assisting former Sandstone Legal clients who may have lost the opportunity to pursue financial mis-selling claims due to the way their cases were handled.

“Our focus is on providing clear, independent legal advice to individuals who are understandably uncertain about their position following Sandstone’s collapse. Where appropriate, we are assessing potential professional negligence claims on a loss of opportunity basis.”

We reported earlier this month that Mr Kurtz had settled the negligence claims of around 130 former clients of SSB Law against the collapsed law firm’s insurer.




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog


AI and law firm risk – the view of professional indemnity insurers

In considering law firm applications for cover, many insurers will expect to see evidence of how firms are adapting to AI and preparing for the future.


Automation in personal injury claims: The evolving legal risks

As automation tools become more sophisticated, they are increasingly used for more complex tasks, such as interpreting evidence and informing case strategy, particular in the PI sector.


A new era of legal operations

What we are seeing in the UK legal market is extraordinary change that will greatly influence how firms operate and compete for years to come.


Loading animation