Insurers invest in new professional negligence ABS


McPhun: Number of corporate investors

A niche alternative business structure (ABS) specialising in defending professional negligence claims has been launched this month, with investment from the insurance industry.

Damian McPhun, managing director of Edesia Law, said “a number of corporate investors” from the insurance and financial services worlds had decided to invest in the ABS.

His decision to set up the firm came after a number of insurers “expressed their frustration” about the way the market dealt with their claims, with the “downward pressure on rates” over the past 15 years leading law firms to commoditise services.

“Some firms seem only concerned with getting bigger. It’s all about costs and profitability and cases are not getting the same individual attention.

“There is a place for a smaller scale, more tailored approach to claims handling.”

Formerly a partner at City insurance and construction firm Beale & Co, Mr McPhun said Edesia aimed to provide “clear early advice and strategy”, particularly for mid-sized Lloyd’s syndicates and managing general agents.

The two main sources of claims Edesia was currently handled were solicitors and independent financial advisers (IFAs). Only around two-thirds of IFAs were backed by indemnity insurers – compared to 90% of solicitors – when it came to defending negligence claims.

Mr McPhun said one of the “key problems” for IFAs had been defined benefits pensions transfers, where a lot of insurers had excluded cover and there were “thousands of claims”.

After solicitors and IFAs, the professionals most likely to feature in claims defended by Edesia were insurance brokers, accountants and construction professionals.

Mr McPhun said he had recruited associate solicitor Joss Owtram and was in the process of recruiting another. Later in the year one or two more solicitors would be recruited.

He has one co-director at Edesia, a non-lawyer with a background in the insurance market, and hoped to appoint another by the end of the year.

“We’ve only been open for two weeks, but we’ve already got a huge amount of work across the professions,” he said. “Things are very buoyant.”

Mr McPhun said this was partly because of the “financial issues” caused by the pandemic and partly because when people worked remotely “things go wrong”.

One of the problems had been the difficulty in ensuring there was proper supervision, while mental health during the pandemic was “certainly” an issue.

“Lawyers and financial advisers are not immune to mental health problems, and employers need to be alive to that. If people are depressed with how things are going at home, it can lead to mistakes.”

Mr McPhun added that small, specialised law firms had been “the way of the world” in the insurance market, until everything got “bigger and more impersonal”.

Edesia was unusual in that most niche professional negligence firms were claimant firms and not defence specialists with insurer backing, the solicitor added.




Blog


What is tech bloat and why is it a problem for law firms?

Too many law firms are adopting shiny new tech without first retiring their legacy systems, causing duplication and unnecessary costs.


The civil courts and the digital divide

Despite the government’s decision to increase Ministry of Justice funding, its budget for 2025-26 is still 14% lower in real terms than in 2007-08.


The Decent Homes Standard scandal

It is well established that the UK has the highest proportion of inadequate housing in all of Europe. But what if the heart of the problem is even worse than we think?


Loading animation