Pannone’s Court of Protection team selects Pilgrim’s LawSoft

Print This Post

11 September 2011


Top 50 law firm Pannone has signed contracts with Legal Futures Associate Pilgrim Systems to implement the market leading LawSoft solution in one of its key departments.

The Court of Protection (CoP) team administers the finances and day-to-day affairs of a diverse range of clients. As such the team requires a flexible system that can cater for its unique services, as well as the standard functionality expected of a modern-day solution incorporating financial and workflow management at its core.

Following an extensive selection procedure, the firm decided to select a fresh, dynamic system for the team. A by-product of this selection process was that the firm had the opportunity to begin a wider assessment of what the market currently has to offer.

Luigi Salzano, Pannone’s senior systems development manager, said: “The CoP team and I were impressed with the depth of LawSoft’s core competencies as well as its ability to cater for non-standard functionality via its flexible design. Our users liked the web interface and the system’s ease of use.”

Colin Kennedy, Pilgrim’s COO, added: “We’ve met with Luigi and his colleagues several times over the years. When this opportunity arose, I believe both parties already knew that we would work well together. I am sure LawSoft will be adopted quickly by the firm and we look forward to working with Luigi and his colleagues for many years to come.”



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017