<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LEGAL FUTURES &#187; Solicitors Regulation Authority</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/tag/solicitors-regulation-authority/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk</link>
	<description>Market intelligence for law firms of the future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:28:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SRA under fire for policing of referral fee ban and insurer/law firm ABSs</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/sra-fire-policing-referral-fee-ban-insurerlaw-firm-abss</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/sra-fire-policing-referral-fee-ban-insurerlaw-firm-abss#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Chadderton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referral fee ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors Regulation Authority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/?p=23321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Solicitors Regulation Authority came under fire this week for the way it is enforcing the referral fee ban, with its director of policy and strategy unable to tell solicitors how many investigations it has started since the ban came into force seven weeks ago.</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/sra-fire-policing-referral-fee-ban-insurerlaw-firm-abss">SRA under fire for policing of referral fee ban and insurer/law firm ABSs</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk">LEGAL FUTURES</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/sra-fire-policing-referral-fee-ban-insurerlaw-firm-abss/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solicitors&#8217; support for OFR crashes</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/solicitors-support-ofr-crashes</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/solicitors-support-ofr-crashes#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 23:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Bindman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OFR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outcomes-focused regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors Regulation Authority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/?p=23149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A Law Society survey finding that a growing number of senior solicitors think outcome-focused regulation places too heavy a burden on firms has drawn a rapid rebuttal from the Solicitors Regulation Authority.</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/solicitors-support-ofr-crashes">Solicitors&#8217; support for OFR crashes</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk">LEGAL FUTURES</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/solicitors-support-ofr-crashes/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unanimous South Eastern Circuit backing gives green light to QASA boycott</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/unanimous-south-eastern-circuit-backing-gives-green-light-qasa-boycott</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/unanimous-south-eastern-circuit-backing-gives-green-light-qasa-boycott#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 23:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Rose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barristers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Executives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar standards board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ILEX Professional Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Services Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price competitive tendering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors Regulation Authority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/?p=23153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The prospect of barristers boycotting the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates became almost certain on Saturday after all but one of more than 1,000 members of the South Eastern Circuit said they would refuse to sign up to it.</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/unanimous-south-eastern-circuit-backing-gives-green-light-qasa-boycott">Unanimous South Eastern Circuit backing gives green light to QASA boycott</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk">LEGAL FUTURES</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/unanimous-south-eastern-circuit-backing-gives-green-light-qasa-boycott/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hanging on the telephone? You must be calling the SRA</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/hanging-telephone-you-must-calling-sra</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/hanging-telephone-you-must-calling-sra#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 23:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Rose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors Regulation Authority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/?p=22991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Just 17% of the 71,000 calls made to the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s contact centre in the first quarter of 2013 were answered within the service level of 60 seconds, new figures have shown. There were also problems with the ethics helpline.</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/hanging-telephone-you-must-calling-sra">Hanging on the telephone? You must be calling the SRA</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk">LEGAL FUTURES</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/hanging-telephone-you-must-calling-sra/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal price comparison websites &#8220;begin to sign up&#8221; to good practice standards</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/legal-price-comparison-websites-begin-sign-up-good-practice-standards</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/legal-price-comparison-websites-begin-sign-up-good-practice-standards#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 23:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Bindman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing & PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Council for Licensed Conveyancers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Services Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Services Consumer Panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors Regulation Authority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/?p=22750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Five legal price comparison websites have signed up to good practice standards issued by two regulators and the Legal Services Consumer Panel – although they are to remain voluntary, with no external validation.</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/legal-price-comparison-websites-begin-sign-up-good-practice-standards">Legal price comparison websites &#8220;begin to sign up&#8221; to good practice standards</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk">LEGAL FUTURES</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/legal-price-comparison-websites-begin-sign-up-good-practice-standards/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Last-ditch bid to delay QASA rejected as Deech argues for necessity of scheme</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/last-ditch-bid-delay-qasa-rejected-deech-argues-necessity-scheme</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/last-ditch-bid-delay-qasa-rejected-deech-argues-necessity-scheme#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 23:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Legal Futures</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barristers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Executives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar standards board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors Regulation Authority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/?p=22245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A last-minute Law Society bid to delay the controversial Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA) until after the government’s consultation on price competitive tendering for criminal work was yesterday rejected by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/last-ditch-bid-delay-qasa-rejected-deech-argues-necessity-scheme">Last-ditch bid to delay QASA rejected as Deech argues for necessity of scheme</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk">LEGAL FUTURES</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/last-ditch-bid-delay-qasa-rejected-deech-argues-necessity-scheme/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Pointless&#8221; consultation to set out SRA plan to pay soaring intervention costs from compensation fund</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/pointless-consultation-set-sra-plan-pay-soaring-intervention-costs-compensation-fund</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/pointless-consultation-set-sra-plan-pay-soaring-intervention-costs-compensation-fund#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 23:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Bindman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors Compensation Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors Regulation Authority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/?p=22259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Solicitors Regulation Authority plans to consult on whether the cost of interventions in failing law firms should be borne by the Compensation Fund have been queried as pointless because there is no realistic alternative.</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/pointless-consultation-set-sra-plan-pay-soaring-intervention-costs-compensation-fund">&#8220;Pointless&#8221; consultation to set out SRA plan to pay soaring intervention costs from compensation fund</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk">LEGAL FUTURES</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/pointless-consultation-set-sra-plan-pay-soaring-intervention-costs-compensation-fund/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SRA survey: quarter of lawyers were privately educated</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/sra-survey-quarter-lawyers-privately-educated</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/sra-survey-quarter-lawyers-privately-educated#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Chadderton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality and diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors Regulation Authority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/?p=22233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The inaugural diversity survey of people working in solicitors’ firms has found that more than a quarter of lawyers went to fee-paying schools – nearly four times the national average. Meanwhile, a review of law firms' approach to diversity has found clients pushing the agenda.</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/sra-survey-quarter-lawyers-privately-educated">SRA survey: quarter of lawyers were privately educated</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk">LEGAL FUTURES</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/sra-survey-quarter-lawyers-privately-educated/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SRA set to relax rules on non-material breaches as nearly 1,000 firms face COLP/COFA action</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/sra-set-relax-rules-non-material-breaches-nearly-1000-firms-face-colpcofa-action</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/sra-set-relax-rules-non-material-breaches-nearly-1000-firms-face-colpcofa-action#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neil Rose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternative business structures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COLP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance officer for finance and administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance officer for legal practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Services Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors Regulation Authority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/?p=22223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Requiring all 10,000 law firms to report non-material breaches to the Solicitors Regulation Authority is “unsustainable and cannot be justified”, the regulator’s board will be told today. Meanwhile, the number of firms and individuals facing action over COLP/COFA nomination failures has risen to 928.</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/sra-set-relax-rules-non-material-breaches-nearly-1000-firms-face-colpcofa-action">SRA set to relax rules on non-material breaches as nearly 1,000 firms face COLP/COFA action</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk">LEGAL FUTURES</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/sra-set-relax-rules-non-material-breaches-nearly-1000-firms-face-colpcofa-action/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SRA plans for ABS fining guidance branded &#8220;premature&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/sra-plans-abs-fining-guidance-branded-premature</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/sra-plans-abs-fining-guidance-branded-premature#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 23:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Legal Futures</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternative business structures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solicitors Regulation Authority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/?p=22130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) plans to issue guidance on the financial penalties it will impose on alternative business structures (ABSs) and those working in them are premature, the Law Society has claimed.</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/sra-plans-abs-fining-guidance-branded-premature">SRA plans for ABS fining guidance branded &#8220;premature&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.legalfutures.co.uk">LEGAL FUTURES</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/sra-plans-abs-fining-guidance-branded-premature/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
