Up to 60 "seriously risky" firms in the ARP

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

10 November 2010


Emergency cover: 71% of firms are new to the ARP

Some 240 of the 336 law firms (71%) in the assigned risks pool (ARP) are new to the insurance safety net, with 10-20% of the total thought to pose a “serious risk”, it has emerged.

Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) papers show that 30-60 firms are in the serious risk category and face immediate SRA investigations, with referrals for regulatory action to be made where appropriate.

The action is part of the SRA’s ARP enforcement strategy, agreed in the summer, which aims to tighten the monitoring and supervision of firms in the pool, and ensure they are all up-to-date with their premiums and, if they are not, that they are “managed out promptly”.

The SRA’s compliance committee will hear next week that only 13 firms which were in the ARP before the 1 October renewal are subject to potential intervention. This was out of 142 firms (from a total of 213) that had either been in the ARP but not paid their premium, or which were approaching the end of the maximum two years in the pool (now reduced to one).

Of the other 129 firms, as at 5 November:

  • 33 have closed;
  • 28 have found insurance on the open market;
  • 52 have obtained further cover in the ARP by either paying the outstanding premiums in full or agreeing an instalment plan – several hundred thousand pounds of outstanding premiums have been collected since mid-July;
  • 13 are being monitoring through wind-down; and
  • 3 have other “outcomes”.

The committee will be told: “The position in relation to the number of firms potentially facing intervention is considerably better than had been feared at the commencement of the enforcement action and this is largely attributed to the close attention paid to firms through the enforcement action process.”

The SRA has a working group meeting weekly, and established a new visit programme for ARP firms facing enforcement, which includes snapshot reports produced within 72 hours of visits starting.

writing resources – how to write an apa style research

Ten of the 88 firms visited in August were referred for further investigation, mainly because books of account were either absent or incomplete, or because there was evidence of client account shortages.

Tags: , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017