Regulator announces crackdown on CMCs cold-calling and taking up-front fees

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

27 August 2010


Cold-calling: regulator to crack down on CMCs breaking rules

The claims management regulator has launched a crackdown on companies that are cold-calling consumers and taking up-front fees without giving clients a reasonable period to consider the agreement they are signing.

The regulator has warned that failure to comply “is likely to lead to enforcement action being taken against the business concerned and could ultimately put the business’s authorisation at risk”.

In a warning just issued to claims management companies (CMCs), it said: “We are aware that some businesses have been cold calling consumers and then referring their claims either directly to a solicitor on indirectly (through other claims management businesses) to a solicitor. Neither is permitted. The Solicitors Regulation Authority has made it clear that their rules on referral arrangements means that solicitors must not have a financial arrangement with an introducer in respect of claims which has been obtained (either by that introducer or through an intermediary) by way of unsolicited face-to-face or telephone ‘cold calling’.”

The regulator said that while many CMCs take up-front fees, some “may be failing to provide prospective clients with compulsory, pre-contract information as required by the Conduct of Authorised Person Rules 2007”. This information includes details of any referral fee.

The warning said it was also aware that “some businesses are not giving clients a reasonable period in which to consider the information. In particular some businesses take card details and/or payment during an initial marketing telephone call”.

This is not permitted and the regulator said CMCs must not take a payment or fee before the pre-contract information is provided in writing and the prospective client has had reasonable time to consider the information. Though a reasonable time is not defined, the regulator said it would always consider it unreasonable to provide the information at the point of contact and request a payment or fee.

Tags: ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

The ethics of the SRA’s social media warning notice

Mena Ruparel

Social media portals are regularly used by firms and those who work for law firms in both professional and personal capacities. Their informal nature and the fast pace of use makes it all too easy for regulated people to get carried away with online discussions or comments which can fall foul of the regulator. This is more likely to happen on social media platforms as these are virtual, accessed in the solicitor’s own time and space. It can be easy to forget that solicitors are regulated just the same at 11pm on their home computer as they are at 3pm in the office or at court.

September 15th, 2017