Law Society revokes 200 solicitors' accreditation scheme membership

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

28 November 2011


Hudson: improvements will serve the public, lenders and members well

The Law Society has recently revoked the membership of 200 members of its accreditation schemes, it has revealed.

The society was responding to the surprise expressed last week by the Legal Services Consumer Panel that it had not appeared to expel anyone from any accreditation scheme over the past five years.

A spokeswoman said: “Expulsion from an accreditation scheme is a tool at our disposal. We have lately developed a system for checking a sample of members’ records to any given Law Society accreditation scheme. We also act on any information we receive about a member. Any member found not to continue to comply with the standards of membership will have their membership revoked.

“Although it’s true to say we haven’t expelled members, we have recently revoked membership of 200 members who no longer fitted the scheme criteria.”

The eight Law Society schemes assessed by the panel met few of the characteristics it thought such schemes should have. The spokeswoman responded: “In summer 2011, Law Society accreditation schemes were subject to an independent quality assurance study which touched on all the issues raised by the consumer panel.

“Since then, we have worked towards implementing the proposals for change, which will strengthen existing accreditation schemes. Our new governance structure, applicable to all Law Society accreditation schemes once implemented in 2012, will incorporate lay input and therefore consumers’ views and needs. A number of our schemes also have lay members sitting on technical advisory panels.

“Ongoing competency checks have already been established and we plan structured re-accreditation procedures for all schemes that currently do not have them. A re-launch for each scheme will make clear to consumers and professionals why they exist and the requirements upon members, as well as why they protect and inform the consumer. That re-launch will also enhance the benefits – webinars, events, CPD – available to our members.”

In the society’s initial response to the panel’s report, chief executive Des Hudson said that if the report’s recommendations would improve the schemes, “we will do so”. Chancery Lane will shortly start unannounced audit visits to members of its Conveyancing Quality Scheme (CQS), he said, “precisely what the report sensibly proposes”.

“CQS has also been designed to allow for ongoing development, so while the consumer panel’s report provides a useful snapshot of the current market, it doesn’t capture fully future Law Society plans which will see our accreditation schemes consistently evolving. We will shortly be announcing the CQS year two scheme details. I am confident that the improvements we are planning will serve the public, lenders and our members well.”

Tags: , ,



Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017