Indemnity insurer extends quote period to 10 days, but rejects Law Society demand for 21

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

2 September 2010


Acceptance period: insurer offers "gesture of goodwill"

The Law Society has squeezed a minor concession out of the unnamed professional indemnity insurer to whom it complained about giving solicitors just seven days to accept quotes.

The insurer has now extended the acceptance period to ten days, having refuted the society’s allegations that seven days contravened Financial Services Authority provisions (see story). But “as a gesture of goodwill”, the insurer has instructed its broker to extend the acceptance period.

The society said: “While we continue to reserve our position on the definition of a reasonable time period for acceptance, we are pleased at the movement made by the insurer in this regard. We maintain that acceptance periods of less than 21 days are insufficient for solicitors to properly consider a quote. We are aware that several other insurers are providing solicitors with ten or fewer days in which to accept quotes.

“We appreciate that some insurers have opted to impose acceptance periods of less than 21 days to help ensure that the value of active quotes does not exceed their premium income limit. Nevertheless, we expect that until this limit is reached, insurers should be willing to reinstate quotes for a further period of time upon request from a solicitor, without increasing the level of the quote – assuming no underlying change in the circumstances underpinning the proposal form.” The society said that “a number of insurers” have indicated that they will do this.

Earlier this week, Danish insurer Alpha Insurance A/S entered the market for firms of up to 25 partners (see here and scroll down).

Tags: ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Be careful you do not leave anything behind: will we see the end of chambers?

Charles Feeny

Experience of practice by digital support suggests that working practices will become much more informal and spontaneous, not requiring support by specific entities or even contractual arrangements. This is likely to be particularly true of the Bar, which is or should be a profession focusing on individuals. The future of the Bar is more likely to resemble a library as seen in Scotland and Ireland – albeit an electronic library – rather than the traditional chambers structure.

January 18th, 2017