4 August 2011Print This Post

Firms have “heads in the sand” over compliance officers

October 2011: firms need to get working on implications of OFR

Law firms are not doing enough to train staff in risk and compliance matters, a leading expert on partnerships has warned – adding that practices must “get their houses in order by October 2011” to be ready for the new regulatory requirements.

The move to outcomes-focused regulation (OFR) in October will give the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) a raft of powers, including the ability to visit law firms on random or risk-based assessments and receive an annual compliance report.

Law firms must also nominate a dedicated compliance officer for legal practice (COLP) to make sure the firm is adhering to the rules and its statutory obligations, although ultimately compliance is a matter for the firm as a whole and not just the COLP.

Firms need to appoint a COLP by March next year, meaning they will have just six months to make sure the firm has all the required processes in place before he or she becomes responsible for disclosure of material gaps to the SRA. The COLP has an obligation to maintain a list of all lapses in compliance and to make it available to the SRA on request and to notify the SRA of serious concerns in any event.

Richard Turnor, a partner at London firm Maurice Turnor Gardner, said that while many firms have been thinking about OFR and the role of the COLP, others seem to “have their heads in the sand”.

 “Firms will have to submit their first annual reports to the SRA in October 2012, covering the period from October 2011 no doubt, and disclosing any lapses about which questions are asked,” he said. “Therefore firms really need to get their houses in order by October 2011.”

Mr Turnor says a COLP needs to be a lawyer, and sufficiently senior to get things done. They should operate clear governance and reporting lines as well as having systems and processes in place to manage general business risks. In addition, law firms should develop a compliance plan and a risk register which identifies the risks and the controls in place as well as those responsible for different areas of risk.

“It will be a valuable tool in the future,” Mr Turnor concluded. “Engage the whole firm in the process and train all staff in what they can do to ensure the effective management of risk and compliance with the SRA handbook.”

Firms also need to appoint a compliance officer for finance and administration (COFA) to oversee adherence to the accounts rules. The COFA does not have to be lawyer, although can be the same person as the COLP if they have the skills to undertake both roles.


By Legal Futures

Tags: , , , , , , , ,



Leave a comment

We encourage you to be part of the Legal Futures community but please note that all comments will be moderated before posting. We draw your attention to clause 5 of the Terms and Conditions of the site, which deals with user-generated content.





Legal Futures Report

 

This first Legal Futures Special Report, in association with Thomson Reuters, examines the changing face of City law firms. It demonstrates how far City law firms have moved in a relatively short period of time, mainly (but not exclusively) in response to the recession and the demands of their clients.

Legal Futures Blog

It’s harder on the phone

Old fashioned phone

It’s been nearly two years since we launched our Excellence Mark programme of client service support for LawNet member firms. And during this time we’ve completed over 1,000 mystery shopping exercises which have revealed some interesting insights for our firms. One of the things that stands out is the discrepancy that still exists between the scores achieved for the walk-in mystery shopping enquiries and those made on the phone.

November 26th, 2014