Council for Licensed Conveyancers is first to apply to become an ABS regulator

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

14 February 2011

Developing profession: licensed conveyancers look to increase the scope of their work

The Council for Licensed Convey-ancers (CLC) is on course to become the first body licensed to regulate alternative business structures, after submitting its application to the Legal Services Board.

The CLC, which oversees 10-15% of the conveyancing market, has also applied to extend the range of reserved activities it regulates from conveyancing and probate to awarding rights of audience and the right to conduct litigation.

If the LSB meets its target of approving applications within six months – and it has to consult with the Office of Fair Trading, Legal Services Consumer Panel and Lord Chief Justice – the Lord Chancellor is likely to be handed its recommendation well before the 6 October ABS start date. He then has up to 90 days to make a decision.

Depending on the outcome of a Law Society council vote next month on whether to approve or block the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s plan to become an ABS regulator, the CLC and the LSB itself could be the only two sources of licences on day one.

The CLC has long allowed external investment, and in support of the application, which runs to 438 pages, the CLC points to the fact that a quarter of the 215 practices it regulates are owned or managed by non-authorised persons (ie, non-lawyers). It says this amounts to a “proven track record” of regulating a form of ABS.

The CLC – which Legal Futures understands is well regarded at the LSB – currently also regulates 1,103 licensed conveyancers and 301 managers. Some 57 licensed conveyancers also have probate rights. Like the SRA, the CLC is adopting outcomes-focused regulation in preparation for ABSs. CLC members were consulted on becoming a licensing body last year.

In its introduction, the CLC’s application says: “Our expertise lies in consumer-focused retail legal services. In licensing these new entities we seek to maintain both our existing reputation and our high standards of innovative and proportionate regulation across an expanded licensee group, with the aim of delivering our vision to be ‘the innovative legal regulator’.”

As things stand, the CLC would only be able to regulate practices providing conveyancing and probate services, which is part of the motivation for increasing the range of reserved activities it can regulate. Unlike the plan it originally consulted on, only licensed conveyancers would be able to apply for litigation and advocacy rights, and they would be granted in incremental stages – starting, for example, with property related law in the county courts (the CLC will not grant criminal rights). They may call themselves CLC litigators or advocates.

CLC-authorised practices would also be allowed to conduct litigation so long as they have a manager with the right to do so and significant experience of it.

CLC chairwoman Anna Bradley is taking part in the unique regulators’ forum at the Legal Futures Conference on 11 April.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017