Legal Services Board plan risks “outing” gay staff, warns Stonewall

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

20 May 2011

Gay pride: current plan could have significant impact on disclosure rates

Lesbian, gay and bisexual lawyers and staff could be inadvertently “outed” as a result of the Legal Services Board’s (LSB) plans to increase diversity in the workplace, leading campaign group Stonewall has warned.

While strongly supporting the LSB’s efforts to build an evidence base of the number of gay people in the legal workforce through monitoring, Stonewall called on the board to identify “alternative methodologies that allow the collation of this data whilst maintaining the anonymity of individuals working in smaller entities”.

Under the LSB plans, every member of staff at every law firm, chambers and other regulated legal entity would have to fill out a diversity questionnaire, with the entity required to publish anonymised results. They will be able to decline to answer.

Stonewall predicted that the risk of “outing” employees to their colleagues in smaller entities “would likely have a significant impact on disclosure rates”.

It said: “Stonewall consistently recommends that sexual orientation monitoring should be anonymous and not allow individuals to be identified by their colleagues or managers.”

Should the LSB do this, the same anonymity standards should apply to all the equality strands on which staff will be questioned, it added.

Stonewall argued that monitoring the sexual orientation of employees, where appropriate, “can provide the vital evidence needed for individual employers to deliver effective change for lesbian, gay and bisexual staff”. It can also help employers and employees track progress in improving the workplace for lesbian, gay and bisexual staff, it said.

It recommended, however, that employers should only monitor sexual orientation when action has already been undertaken to address lesbian, gay and bisexual equality in their workplaces.

“This is to ensure lesbian, gay and bisexual employees have the confidence to complete monitoring exercises, making monitoring data more robust and usable. Stonewall are concerned that the LSB proposals may result in data which is neither robust nor reliable due to poor disclosure rates.”

While not opposing the LSB’s intention not to make entities take specific actions as a result of the monitoring results, the charity said many employers “do not believe lesbian, gay and bisexual equality is something relevant to their workplace and lack understanding of how to implement policies and practices that make their workplaces more gay-friendly”.

It is therefore for the LSB and its partners to play a crucial role in providing information and support to entities on how they can address lesbian, gay and bisexual workplace equality, Stonewall said.

Tags: ,

One Response to “Legal Services Board plan risks “outing” gay staff, warns Stonewall”

  1. Well, I agree with Stonewall. They do seem to be trying to deal with an uncomfortable reality that it seems even in the legal profession (of all business types) lesbian, gay or bisexual people might face discrimination from their colleagues.

    Isn’t that very, very sad in 2011?

    I would hope that most firms have already long ago dealt with equality issues, but maybe not. I don’t agree it is for the LSB to inform us. It is informaiton that all law firms can obtain and is readily available via the Law Society diversity section.

  2. Andrew Woolley on May 20th, 2011 at 1:28 pm

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

The LSB’s proposals for legislative reform: let’s be clear

Caroline Wallace LSB

The publication of the Legal Services Board’s vision for legislative reform of legal services regulation on 12 September has generated a healthy level of interest and debate. This can, on the surface, seem a somewhat dry subject. However, it has an impact not just on existing regulated practitioners, but also on providers of legal services more generally, as well as everyone who uses or benefits from an effective legal sector. And, let’s face it, that’s all of us.

October 25th, 2016