Goodbye SDT? Legal Services Board sets sights on “rationalising” disciplinary regimes

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

10 May 2011

Costs: SRA exercised veto over concerns about powers of First-tier Tribunal

The Legal Services Board (LSB) is considering whether to consolidate the disciplinary regimes run by all the different legal regulators, it has emerged.

It said concerns raised by both the Law Society and Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) about consistency between appeals under the existing arrangements and appeals involving alternative business structures (ABSs) “suggest we should explore the feasibility of rationalising existing mechanisms sooner rather than later”.

The revelation came in a consultation paper issued by the LSB on a recommendation to the Lord Chancellor that he change the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal’s remit so that it can hear appeals against a range of decisions made by the SRA in relation to ABSs.

The LSB’s plan was that appeals from decisions of any ABS licensing authority any should go to the general regulatory chamber of the First-tier Tribunal, but while it originally supported this, the SRA eventually vetoed it. The LSB has been unable to allay the SRA’s concerns that the chamber will not be able to make the same costs orders as the SDT.

The LSB said: “There are a number of compelling reasons why it is a desirable policy objective for all legal services appeals (about ABS, ‘traditional’ firms, and all authorised persons) to be dealt with through a single, consistent mechanism.

“Establishing a single mechanism has not been feasible in the timescales for introducing ABS. Approved regulators currently have a range of separate discipline and appeals arrangements in place, and we intend to review whether it is appropriate to rationalise these in due course.”

The paper indicated that after preparatory work in the next year, the review could be properly launched in 2012/13.

Tags: , , , ,

One Response to “Goodbye SDT? Legal Services Board sets sights on “rationalising” disciplinary regimes”

  1. I am not a member of the legal profession. What concerns me are attempts to limit the amount of compensation. Compensation must be generous enough to compensate for genuine loss.

  2. Mrs D Mitchell on June 15th, 2012 at 2:12 am

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

The LSB’s proposals for legislative reform: let’s be clear

Caroline Wallace LSB

The publication of the Legal Services Board’s vision for legislative reform of legal services regulation on 12 September has generated a healthy level of interest and debate. This can, on the surface, seem a somewhat dry subject. However, it has an impact not just on existing regulated practitioners, but also on providers of legal services more generally, as well as everyone who uses or benefits from an effective legal sector. And, let’s face it, that’s all of us.

October 25th, 2016