Minister behind ABSs warns over the threat they pose to legal ethics

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

20 February 2011


Falconer: ABSs are challenging for the preservation of legal ethics

Lord Falconer, who as Lord Chancellor steered the Legal Services Act through Parliament, last week warned about the challenges alternative business structures (ABSs) provide for “the preservation of legal ethics”.

In a speech to a seminar on the future of legal education, hosted by Inner Temple, the Labour frontbencher also said the imbalance between the number of bar students and pupillages meant “we are close to the point” where a cap should be imposed on the number of places on the bar professional training course.

Lord Falconer said the effect of ABSs will be “to weaken the ability of the legal profession’s regulators to monitor and control the provision of legal services”.

Currently, solicitors and barristers may have to borrow from banks to meet their funding needs, “but it is they who take the risks, so it is their ethics and their standards which determine the standards and ethics of the entity”, he said.

But external investment means that while there are requirements that the lawyers make legal decisions in an independent way, “inevitably the nature of the organisation is that its driving force will not be exclusively barristers or solicitors steeped in the values and the culture of the law. Its ethics and values will come as much, if not more, from the investors and managers, who will be driven exclusively by the commercial pressure”.

The peer said that while ABSs were “good in many respects for the consumer of legal services”, they were “challenging for the preservation of legal ethics”.

Despite the comments – which Professor Stephen Mayson described in a tweet from the event as a “jaw-dropping comment from the responsible minister” – Lord Falconer stressed to Legal Futures afterwards that he was not backtracking in his support for ABSs, given the strength of the consumer case for them. That they would pose ethical challenges was accepted from the start, he said.

The potential for pressure from non-lawyer owners to act unethically has been one of the main arguments against ABSs. But research commissioned by Lord Falconer’s then department in 2005 from Paul Grout, a professor of political economy at Bristol University, said this overlooked the fact that there would be little personal gain for the lawyer in acting unprofessionally. By contrast, he reasoned, where the lawyer has a larger ownership of the business, there is far more incentive to take the risk.

On capping the numbers on the BPTC, Lord Falconer said the argument for not doing so is that those who want to should be allowed to take their chances – “the greater the pressure, the higher the quality”. On the other hand, the absence of a cap “favours the better funded, which increases the narrowing of the base”.

He concluded: “I believe we are close the point where we should impose a restriction. It is an issue I hope the regulators will address in their review [of legal education and training]. Ultimately the crushed hopes of so many after the expenditure of over £50,000 are not good for the profession. We would rightly be accused to leading people on in a way which is not necessary for the well-being of the profession.”

The spectre of competition law has always been raised when a cap on student numbers is considered, but 2010 Bar Council chairman Nick Green, in an earlier address to the event, said he saw “no rational argument” under competition law which says the market should decide.

He said: “This is a market which is already hugely distorted by governmental decisions in relation to education and this will remain a feature of the landscape. And in any event, the law is clear that in relation to the liberal professions such as the law, whether a particular rule or practice affects completion is not the sole lodestar for analysis. The law, as confirmed by the European Court of Justice, is that public interest considerations relating to the profession which are applied objectively, reasonably and proportionately can take precedence.”

For further reading on ABSs and ethics, Professor Richard Moorhead has blogged in the wake of Lord Falconer’s speech.

Tags: , , , , ,



2 Responses to “Minister behind ABSs warns over the threat they pose to legal ethics”

  1. I think Richard Moorhead’s blog on this says all that needs to be said in response. But just to add my two penn’orth…

    To assume lawyers are more ethical than other business people is just nonsense and yet another example of the profession’s misplaced self importance. The words ‘coal miners’ compensation scheme’ spring to mind, but I came across many other less high profile examples of lawyers abusing their position of trust when I worked at Which?

    I am surprised Lord Falconer has succombed to this, but then for all his common sense he is also a lawyer.

  2. Louise Restell on February 21st, 2011 at 10:30 am
  3. Where did Lord Falconer accept that ABSs provide ethical challenges? This has been identified throughout as a major potential problem and is one which, to my recollection, the previous Government were not terribly concerned about.

    I still don’t accept Lord Falconer’s commissioned research from before (see above) that somehow employed lawyers in ‘externally owned’ businesses will magically behave more ethically – if evidence potentially incriminates a business to such an extent that it threatens the existence of that business, the lawyer will lose their job/income/home/everything else when that business goes down whether or not they also own the business. How does the pressure to act unethically and destroy that incriminating evidence suddenly lessen or disappear when the lawyer is in the employ of others? Losing your livelihood is losing your livelihood, whether you are employed by others or self-employed. The pressure to act ethically remains the same.

  4. Scott Stemp on February 21st, 2011 at 11:51 am

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Lawyers must now draw on the data and drive change

Chris Marston 2014

The results from this year’s legal services consumer tracker survey make for interesting reading. In its sixth year, the research finds that a firm’s reputation continues to grow in importance, holding its top slot as the number one factor influencing choice of lawyer, with price remaining a strong second, reflected in a shift towards higher numbers of fixed-fee transactions. Alongside, it reports that trust in lawyers has declined to 42%, from 47% in 2012. It’s useful information as far as it goes, but what is the sector going to do with it?

September 26th, 2016