Spiralling partnership disputes and “partner-exiting climate” encouraging specialist ADR

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

5 January 2011


Let's be friends: mediation can offer significant benefits

A spiralling number of partnership disputes is encouraging the development of specialist alternative dispute resolution, experts have said.

It has led to the Association of Partnership Practitioners (APP) launching a Directory of Partnership Dispute Arbitrators and Mediators.

The APP said court statistics show the High Court heard 106 partnership dispute cases in 2009, compared with 54 in 2008, at a time when the number of new cases overall in the Chancery Division fell 5%.

APP chairman Simon Bevan, senior partner of accountants BDO, said: “In the partner-exiting climate that we have experienced during 2010, there seems to be every likelihood that the 2009 figures will be exceeded in 2010. For every partnership or LLP dispute in the High Court, there are undoubtedly many more arbitrations behind closed doors, as most professional practice agreements these days contain an arbitration clause. And for every partnership or LLP dispute in the High Court or in arbitration, there is usually a mediation that either precedes the commencement of proceedings or occurs at some time before trial.”

An APP workshop recently debated the relative merits of mediation and arbitration as methods of resolving partnership disputes. Workshop chairman Peter Garry, head of the partnerships and professional practices group at South East firm Cripps Harries Hall, said: ”Our very experienced arbitrator and mediator speakers highlighted the differences between their respective approaches and the different outcomes that can result. There are significant benefits to be gained by designing a mediation process that fits the needs of the participants in a partnership dispute, particularly a multi-party dispute, and considerable savings in costs can be made. On the other hand, sometimes there are issues that the parties are never going to agree on, and arbitration can provide certainty and finality, often quite quickly.”

Mr Garry, an APP committee member, led the project to set up the directory. He said: “What we are trying to address and rectify is the situation in which parties who are not already aware of a suitable candidate, upon whom they can agree, are dependent on the recommendations of appointing bodies. Our aim has been to become the first port of call for anyone looking for a partnership or LLP dispute arbitrator or mediator.”

Tags: ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Disruptive innovation: the Christensen thesis hits law schools and legal services

Roger Smith

A report from the Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation warns that law schools in the US are “in crisis” and doomed unless they must respond positively to the “disruption of the traditional model for the provision of legal services”. The report relishes the coming of Armageddon by a sector whose financial viability it says will soon be choked off by the transformation of the legal market. How does this thesis stack up from the other side of the Atlantic?

February 28th, 2017