Narrowing pay gap with Asia "encouraging" law firms to set up domestic outsourcing operations

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

13 December 2011


Belfast: two major City firms have set up operations

The narrowing gap between wages paid in the UK and in booming Asian economies mean offshore legal process outsourcing (LPO) providers are facing a growing threat from law firms setting up their own onshore operations, an LPO consultancy has claimed.

Fronterion put the squeeze this is having on LPO providers’ profitability at the top of its annual list of the top 10 trends it expects to see in the market during the coming year, with the growing cohort of unemployed law students set to exacerbate the competition.

Many international firms have outsourced work to places like India and the Philippines but, as these economies grow stronger, the gap between the wages in the developing and developed countries continues to narrow. Research suggests, for instance, that India could see double-digit wage increase during the next few years.

“Wage inflation abroad and soft labour markets domestically in the US and UK have significantly narrowed the cost differential for the legal professionals performing LPO services,” Fronterion said.

It found offshore LPO providers are charging clients $25-35 (£16-22) an hour for “basic” legal services. “In the UK comparable rates for legal professionals are seen in many areas outside of London,” the report said. “The soft labour rates in the domestic legal sector place a natural cap on the amount LPO vendors can charge their clients, despite the increasingly expensive wages they pay their offshore staff.

“This squeeze in profitability is only set to increase in 2012 as the newly minted law graduates in the US and UK, who flocked to law schools during the downturn, are now seeking to join the workforce.”

The report said that while much of the “value proposition” of LPO went beyond basic wage arbitrage, most legal professionals, all things being equal, prefer to keep legal work domestically.

“For example, challenges with the offshore LPO model – such as professional obligations, client comfort, time zone differentials, language barriers and data protection concerns – are easily sidestepped when using domestic legal vendors.”

So while onshore or domestic LPO services represent a “major growth segment” for the LPO industry, Fronterion cautioned that this could hamper vendors in persuading law firms to go with them rather than set up their own domestic outsourcing centres – as City firms Herbert Smith and Allen & Overy have done in Belfast, for example.

As a result, LPO vendors must focus on growth beyond what Fronterion called the “unsustainable concentration on litigation support services”. Companies must diversify service lines, concentrating on contractual matters or due diligence on M&A deals, for instance, in a bid to strengthen law firm client relations.

“Litigation support is the easiest service line to outsource in part because it is the most readily broken down into discrete legal tasks through what is known as legal disaggregation,” the report said.

“Expanding service adoption in 2012 will be an uphill battle but worth the effort. Failing to make this expansion and provide a progressive value proposition to clients, the LPO industry faces the risk of commoditisation and stagnation.”

Tags: ,



Legal Futures Blog

GDPR and the rise of ‘datanapping’ – the new threat to the pockets of law firms

Nigel Wright

You’ve heard about ransomware – a hacker infiltrates your IT systems, locking them down until you pay a ransom. Some studies now estimate that over 50% of businesses have experienced this type of attack in the last year, and it’s particularly prevalent within the legal sector. Previously, firms could protect themselves by having a solid disaster recovery plan in place to ensure they can get back up and running in the event of a disruption. However, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) – the new EU-wide regime which comes in effect on 25 May 2018, irrespective of Brexit – means that this approach alone is no longer adequate and security measures must be strengthened to prevent attacks.

April 21st, 2017