£3m scheme to help disadvantaged students into law is “showing results”

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

4 July 2011


University: Pathways students more likely to apply to top institutions

A groundbreaking scheme aimed at young people from disadvantaged backgrounds who are interested in a legal career is helping them with their university ambitions, new figures have shown.

Students who have gone through the £3m Pathways to Law scheme are more successful in gaining a place at Russell Group or 1994 Group universities than a comparator group who have not received the same support.

Social mobility is a major issue in the profession at the moment, with the Legal Services Board due shortly to publish the way forward on diversity monitoring of the profession, which includes social mobility.

Since its inception in 2007, 1,250 A-level students have taken part in Pathways. They are chosen for their academic ability, interest in studying law and/or pursuing law as a career, and for coming from a family with little or no history of higher education.

Over two years they attend lectures, seminars and guidance sessions held by the seven partner universities – Bristol, Leeds, London School of Economics, Manchester, Southampton, University College London and Warwick – and at regional centres of the College of Law.

They also have a short work placement at a law firm, attend a three-day national conference and are assigned a current university law student as a mentor.

Pathways was started by the College of Law and the Sutton Trust, a charity which aims to promote social mobility through education. Extra financial support comes from the Law Society and nine City law firms – Allen & Overy, Clifford Chance, DLA Piper, Eversheds, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Hogan Lovells, Linklaters, Mayer Brown and Simmons & Simmons. The firms also provide work placements.

A further 17 law firms across the country, as well as two chambers and the Inner Temple, offer placements and other opportunities to the students.

The first Pathways annual report said the scheme raises participants’ academic ambitions, with 85% of the first cohort of students applying to Russell Group universities, compared with 61% of the comparator group.

It continued: “Importantly, Pathways students were also more likely to go on and gain admittance to leading universities than members of the comparator groups. So, for example, one-third of Pathways students were accepted at Russell Group universities, compared to 26% of the comparator group one.

“Overall, 47% of Pathways students were admitted to a leading university (defined as Russell Group or 1994 Group), compared to 41% of the same comparator group… Pathways students were particularly successful at gaining entry to one of host Pathways universities, with 17% doing so compared to just 7% of similar students.”

In line with the objectives of the programme, a high proportion of the first cohort (54%) went on to study law at degree level, with a further quarter studying subjects with traditionally high rates of postgraduate conversion to law.

Richard de Friend, chairman of the academic board at the College of Law, said: “Although proving a definite effect for any given educational intervention is notoriously difficult, there are indications that Pathways to Law is having a positive impact. The scheme is generally reaching the right students and there appears to be a clear benefit in terms of increasing the likelihood of admission to a top university.”

Tags: ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Do not fear robot lawyers – fear robot clients

Pulat Yunusov

Tech is famous for its shorter and shorter hype cycles. Robot lawyers were all over the twitters only a few months ago and now people actually yell at you for even mentioning the thing. Of course, robot lawyers should not even have surfaced in the first place because no one is remotely close to building them. Lawyers should not fear for their livelihoods. But there is something that is much more important than robot lawyers. It’s robot clients. Or at least the proliferation of machines, automated transactions, and standardized processes where lawyers once controlled the terrain.

September 20th, 2016