The future of criminal legal aid practice? The one-stop shop barrister/solicitor LDP

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

27 September 2010

Wake-up call: will barristers want to attend the police station at 3am?

It is “absolutely inevitable” that criminal legal aid practices will need to morph into a cross between a solicitors’ firm and barristers’ chambers, one of the founders of a groundbreaking firm in the north-east of England has claimed.

Nick Peacock, who along with fellow barrister Brian Mark and solicitor John Turner recently formed Kyles Legal Practice, said they had created the legal disciplinary practice offering a full in-house service from police station to court because “it was obvious to me and others that there wasn’t much of a future for the junior Bar”.

Kyles, headquartered in North Shields, was set up in July with a legal aid contract for 12 offices across the region. Seven are already open and the firm is on nine duty rotas.

The structure chimes with the vision of Bar Council chairman Nick Green QC, who said in June that the criminal Bar needs to transform itself into “fully functioning litigation units” within the next 12 to 24 months if it wants to survive (see story).

Mr Peacock, who had been in chambers for 15 years and previously worked in-house at law firms, said that though the Bar would have to adapt, “it will be a struggle to get some barristers out of bed at 3am to go to a police station”.

He explained that the aim was to build a different kind of firm – the three partners have agreed, for example, that they will be paid no more than solicitor fee-earners. The firm has 15 lawyers at the moment and is currently recruiting more lawyers to join duty rotas. They will be consultants paid a percentage of the money they bring in.

Predicting that “one case, one fee” would become a reality in the next year to 18 months, the barrister said they were sure they could make a business of criminal legal aid, even though it is “always a struggle”.

Mr Peacock was full of praise for the Bar Standards Board, Solicitors Regulation Authority, Legal Services Commission and Crispin Passmore, strategy director at the Legal Services Board and formerly head of the Community Legal Service at the Legal Services Commission, for the help and advice they gave in setting up the firm. However, he said he has experienced “animosity” from the local legal profession.

Tags: , , , ,

One Response to “The future of criminal legal aid practice? The one-stop shop barrister/solicitor LDP”

  1. I read with interest the article on Kyles legal practice written by Nick Peacock. I would be interested to know if the first firm the embrace this new way of working has made a success of it. The issue of how to deal with returns and juggling with a small number of higher rights lawyers in a 12 office firm strikes me as a clerking nightmare

  2. Harry Pugh on March 29th, 2011 at 9:01 am

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017