Rocket Lawyer: we want lawyers to join but you will have to give free advice

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

24 October 2011

Moore: high level of investment interest

Lawyers who sign up as suppliers to US online legal documents business Rocket Lawyer – which is coming to the UK next year – will be expected to do a significant amount of work for nothing, founder Charley Moore has revealed.

Stressing how excited he is by the UK market, he told last week’s Legal Futures conference, sponsored by NatWest, that his company, which is backed by search giant Google’s venture capital arm among others, was an ideal harbour for sole practitioners who wanted to operate virtual law practices under the umbrella of a major brand.

In the US, Rocket Lawyer has five million registered users who create half a million documents a month through the site. Since it started in August 2008, the company has helped 30m people, Mr Moore said.

Lawyers choosing to affiliate with Rocket Lawyer can place their profiles on the site for free. “Hundreds of thousands” of US lawyers “are coming to us in droves, to grow their practices and find some competitive advantage”, he commented.

But lawyers supplying services under Rocket Lawyer’s subscription plans, which give customers access to a wide range of personal and company legal documents, are obliged to review documents without payment with a view to selling other paid-for services. These can only be charged at 60% of the lawyer’s usual hourly rate.

Those who simply register their profiles on Rocket Lawyer’s website and operate “outside the plan” are free “to charge whatever [they] want”, said Mr Moore.

He compared free document review to the sort of deferred billing facility lawyers might offer to a start-up company in the expectation of future business once it was running profitably.

Mr Moore said he was “really excited about the UK market”. There was a high level of investment interest and “a ton of energy out there”. He emphasised that bringing UK lawyers on board was key to his business plan: “Rocket Lawyer is about lawyers… When we do business here it’s about lawyers also; it’s about a complete solution and lawyers are a big part of that.”

He stressed the advantages to individual lawyers of being able to operate flexible businesses in the form of a “web law office” run in the cloud and marketed through paid-for advertising on the Rocket Lawyer web site.

Meanwhile, the other US online legal document business coming to the UK next year – LegalZoom, commonly described as the best-known legal brand in America – told delegates that their detailed knowledge of their client base represents “an enormous advantage” over new entrants such as Rocket Lawyer and LegalZoom if they act quickly.

Co-founder Eddie Hartman said engaging clients in the first place is “ten times as hard” as retaining existing ones.

He continued: “You’ve spent years getting to know your customers, your clients. You know what their problems are. If you want to compete successfully against [the likes of LegalZoom], take what you know and apply it. That’s an enormous advantage that you have right now if you seize it.”


One Response to “Rocket Lawyer: we want lawyers to join but you will have to give free advice”

  1. I attended this conference and was very interested to hear plans for the UK launch of Rocket Lawyer and Legal Zoom. But to recap, they are targeting sole practitioners, who need to fund their own PI cover and other related costs, provide free documents, free legal advice and reduce their fees by 40%. I know nothing about the US legal environment, but I have a feeling it’s going to be very difficult for many sole practitioners in the UK to make ends meet under such an arrangement. Surely the “complete solution” (at least in the UK) should also include creating an affordable environment for solicitors to provide such free and discounted services in the first place, which is exactly what UK based fee-share law firms are doing already.

    Chris Setford
    Setfords Solicitors

  2. chris setford on October 24th, 2011 at 8:56 pm

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017