LSB ramps up preparations for regulating ABSs directly

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

23 February 2011


Twin tacks: LSB preparing to separate its operations

A director of the Office of Fair Trading is heading a new committee to oversee the Legal Services Board’s contingency planning to regulate alternative business structures directly, Legal Futures can reveal.

LSB member Bill Moyes – who will be joined by another lay and a professional member of the board, who have yet to be chosen – has been charged with keeping the need for the LSB to become an ABS licensing authority under “active review”.

The LSB’s executive team has also been authorised to work on how the board’s activities, staff and finances would be separated if need be.

As first reported by Legal Futures, the LSB preparing itself for the possibility that the Law Society Council will not approve the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s application to become a licensing authority. The LSB is under a statutory duty to ensure that any organisation which wants to become an ABS on 6 October has an authority to which it can apply for a licence.

So far only the Council for Licensed Conveyancers has submitted an application to become a licensing authority, but is currently competent to regulate just two reserved legal activities – conveyancing and probate – although it has applied to the board for the right to grant rights of audience and the right to conduct litigation.

Mr Moyes is a non-executive director of the Office of Fair Trading, as well as an associate of the Institute for Government, a trustee of the Nuffield Trust, and an adviser to a number of commercial and voluntary organisations. His varied background takes in senior roles in the civil service and banking, as well as spells as director-general of the British Retail Consortium and executive chairman of Monitor, the independent regulator of NHS foundation trusts.

ILEX Professional Standards has indicated its intention to apply to become a licensing authority – but not until next year – while the Bar Standards Board is still considering whether it will seek to become a specialist regulator of advocacy firms.

Under the Legal Services Act, only approved regulators can seek to become ABS licensing authorities, which would exclude other bodies. In addition to the eight legal bodies, the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants and the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Scotlandare approved in relation just to reserved probate activities, but have yet to make use of their powers. The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales has also signalled its intention to seek probate rights.

The LSB’s main board was told recently that both the separation of functions and licensing rules – particularly if it takes an approach based on outcomes wherever possible – are likely to be “relatively straightforward”.

Tags: , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Do not fear robot lawyers – fear robot clients

Pulat Yunusov

Tech is famous for its shorter and shorter hype cycles. Robot lawyers were all over the twitters only a few months ago and now people actually yell at you for even mentioning the thing. Of course, robot lawyers should not even have surfaced in the first place because no one is remotely close to building them. Lawyers should not fear for their livelihoods. But there is something that is much more important than robot lawyers. It’s robot clients. Or at least the proliferation of machines, automated transactions, and standardized processes where lawyers once controlled the terrain.

September 20th, 2016