Government under fire for closing LSB, ombudsman and consumer panel websites

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

10 March 2011


Parliament: Hayter launches attack on government

The Cabinet Office has refused to confirm whether it is going ahead with shutting down the websites of the Legal Services Board, Legal Ombudsman and Legal Services Consumer Panel after a strong attack in the House of Lords last night that claimed the move threatens the independence of the legal profession.

Legal Futures first reported the threat last November but it had gone quiet and there were hopes that it had faded away. However, the three received another letter last week ordering them to close down their sites by the end of the month. They will instead be moved into the Ministry of Justice’s website, as part of a broader rationalisation of government websites.

Baroness Hayter, who chairs the consumer panel, described the move to peers last night as “a quite serious swipe” at the three given the importance of their and the profession’s independence from government. She said they have strongly protested against the direction to use “an approved government website”. Elizabeth France, who chairs the board of the ombudsman, has pointed out to Cabinet Office minister Frances Maude that other ombudsman all have .org.uk URLs, “signifying their independence from the sectors on which they adjudicate and their independence from government”.

Baroness Hayter added: “Our three websites cost nothing to the public purse as they are funded by lawyers, so there is no public expenditure rationale for this. However, it raises serious constitutional issues about the independence of the governance of those bodies, something to which the government seem a little deaf.”

She said she would prefer the panel to have no website at all rather than “being an arm of the government’s”, adding: “I hope it will not come to that, with all its implications for transparency, to say nothing of my role as chair. The Secretary of State, I am sure, would remove me fairly promptly if I were to disobey in those ways.”

Recently announced amendments to the Public Bodies Bill – which was the legislation under debate when Baroness Hayter spoke – mean that the Legal Services Board can no longer be abolished simply by ministerial order, but she suggested that closing the websites might be “a new way of exercising control and undermining the independence of a body”.

A Cabinet Office spokeswoman told Legal Futures: “As part of the government’s response to the UK Digital Champion’s proposals around government on the Internet, we are exploring options to make it easy for citizens to access government online services, together with a strategic and long-term reduction in the costs of the state’s web estate and other digital media.”

A Legal Services Board spokesman said: “We continue to discuss these issues with the department.”

Tags: , , ,



One Response to “Government under fire for closing LSB, ombudsman and consumer panel websites”

  1. Perhaps when a Government spokesperson says the moves are to “make it easy for citizens to access government online services, together with a strategic and long-term reduction in the costs of the state’s web estate and other digital media”, someone else should point out that the websites are not ‘government online services’ and shouldn’t become so, and neither do they affect ‘the cost of the state’s web estate’ unless they do become so.

  2. Stephen Mayson on March 10th, 2011 at 6:40 pm

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

GDPR and the rise of ‘datanapping’ – the new threat to the pockets of law firms

Nigel Wright

You’ve heard about ransomware – a hacker infiltrates your IT systems, locking them down until you pay a ransom. Some studies now estimate that over 50% of businesses have experienced this type of attack in the last year, and it’s particularly prevalent within the legal sector. Previously, firms could protect themselves by having a solid disaster recovery plan in place to ensure they can get back up and running in the event of a disruption. However, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) – the new EU-wide regime which comes in effect on 25 May 2018, irrespective of Brexit – means that this approach alone is no longer adequate and security measures must be strengthened to prevent attacks.

April 21st, 2017