Consumer panel

Consumers “still see lawyers as too expensive”, says research

Elisabeth Davies, October 2012 lo res

Close to half of consumers of legal services are not satisfied with the value for money they received, with probate providing the least satisfaction and will writing the most, according to research. Just 57% considered they received value for money on average.

June 17th, 2013

Consumer panel calls for radical reform of financial protection arrangements

Elisabeth Davies, October 2012 lo res

A single scheme joining up professional indemnity insurance and compensation funds across the whole legal services market – including unregulated providers – should be actively explored, the Legal Services Consumer Panel has recommended.

June 10th, 2013

Survey: shopping around works for legal consumers, but too few do it

Elisabeth Davies, October 2012 lo res

The minority of consumers who shop around for legal services are likely to be more satisfied by the service they receive from their chosen provider, new research has found. The findings on how consumers choose lawyers are likely to give encouragement to high street lawyers.

May 30th, 2013

Fixed fees play major role in client satisfaction, survey finds

the road of money

The use of fixed fees in family, probate and housing cases has risen significantly, leading to far higher rates of client satisfaction than when they pay by the hour, according to a major consumer survey.

May 21st, 2013

Consumer panel warns government against restricting choice of solicitor for legal aid clients

Elisabeth Davies, October 2012 lo res

The Legal Services Consumer Panel has strongly criticised the government’s plan to deny defendants the right to choose their own solicitor under price competitive tendering, with new data showing that legally aided clients are more likely to shop around than any other.

May 20th, 2013

Legal price comparison websites “begin to sign up” to good practice standards

Elisabeth Davies lo res

Five legal price comparison websites have signed up to good practice standards issued by two regulators and the Legal Services Consumer Panel – although they are to remain voluntary, with no external validation.

May 10th, 2013

Consumer panel concern over struck-off solicitors acting as McKenzie Friends

Elisabeth Davies, October 2012 lo res

Struck-off solicitors are acting as McKenzie Friends, raising ethical concerns and providing a service that gives no recourse to the Legal Ombudsman, the Legal Services Consumer Panel has warned as it highlighted issues around the unbundling of legal services that it is set to investigate.

April 11th, 2013

Consumer group urges “NHS Direct for law”

Elisabeth Davies, October 2012 lo res

There is “a compelling moral and economic case” for the Legal Services Board to pursue initiatives such as an NHS Direct-style telephone service to help people find the legal advice they need, its consumer adviser has urged.

March 15th, 2013

SRA approach to referral fee ban receives LSB green light

SRA reception sign

The Legal Services Board yesterday put the seal of approval on the SRA’s plans to regulate the referral fee ban. The news came as the Law Society pressed the LSB to provide reassurance that the way referral fees are regulated will be consistent across the entire legal profession.

March 8th, 2013

Mid-Staffs scandal highlights dangers of defensive culture in the law, says consumer chief

Ethics under magnifying crime

A culture of defensiveness among lawyers risks the sort of regulatory failure that occurred in the Mid-Staffordshire Hospital Trust patient neglect scandal – and legal regulators must take heed, the head of the Legal Services Consumer Panel has warned.

February 14th, 2013