“Unbalanced promotion of competition” puts lawyers’ ethical standards at risk

Print This Post

26 November 2014


scales of justice

Ethics debate essential to avoid damaging justice

The “unbalanced promotion of competition” in the legal services market “carries dangers” and puts ethical standards at risk, a major report based on a survey of 966 solicitors and barristers has concluded.

Implementation of the changes contained in the Legal Services Act should be accompanied by “debate about their ethical implications” to avoid damaging justice, the report by Birmingham University said.

“Replacing ‘client’ with ‘consumer’ reframes the expert-client relationship, dependent on integrity and trust, as an exchange relationship in the market.”

The study argued that “while competition can certainly aid accountability and contribute to professional standards”, it was not the ‘most effective way to deliver all the regulatory objectives’ – a phrase taken from an interview with representatives of the Legal Services Board.

Error, group does not exist! Check your syntax! (ID: 14)

The study, entitled Virtuous Character for the Practice of Law, was produced by the Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues, based at Birmingham University’s education department.

It argued that commoditising legal services could be “destructive of legal ethics”, and that, worse than removing the personal element to lawyer-client relations, is “allowing price, competition and deal-making to be the principal tests of success”.

The report said that codes of conduct “inevitably fail to cover all eventualities” and a broader perspective on ‘good law’ should contribute to “rethinking the content” of undergraduate degrees.

“Undergraduate courses on ethics can be exciting and innovative opportunities for study. Consideration of ethical principles and the virtues of ‘good law’ can help embed a broad conception of what the law means.”

The report recommended that law schools “do more to help students make an informed choice about the area of law they may wish to practice”, so their career paths were better matched to their ethical preferences.

“Earlier and greater emphasis on the wider ethical context of legal practice can better prepare individuals for the pressures of the workplace. As a crucible for shaping ethical behaviour and sentiment, local communities of professional practice are often viewed as more influential than compliance systems.”

The report warned that if workplace culture was “skewed towards commercial reward”, then what constituted ‘good law’ could be “dubiously redefined”.

Law firms and chambers should be aware of the influence of their organisation on ethics, but supervisors of legal trainees had “less status than their role requires”.

“Working with senior role models, they provide an important route to creating opportunities for reflecting on ethics and practicing ethically. The status of such supervisors must be enhanced.”

 

Tags: , ,



One Response to ““Unbalanced promotion of competition” puts lawyers’ ethical standards at risk”

  1. Timely reporting, thank you Neil.

    From my reading of the Birmingham University report, it is not grounded in any evidence – one way or the other. An interpretation of its thrust is defence of the status quo.

    Is protection of true professionalism important? No questio, it is vital. Is competition necessarily antithetical? Not proven.

    To contrary, Australia has some evidence that competition may improve access and equity. Read Steve Mark’s work.

  2. George Beaton on November 26th, 2014 at 8:35 pm

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Do not fear robot lawyers – fear robot clients

Pulat Yunusov

Tech is famous for its shorter and shorter hype cycles. Robot lawyers were all over the twitters only a few months ago and now people actually yell at you for even mentioning the thing. Of course, robot lawyers should not even have surfaced in the first place because no one is remotely close to building them. Lawyers should not fear for their livelihoods. But there is something that is much more important than robot lawyers. It’s robot clients. Or at least the proliferation of machines, automated transactions, and standardized processes where lawyers once controlled the terrain.

September 20th, 2016