TAG solicitor loses appeal against striking-off

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

4 April 2012


legalfutures

co

uk/wp-content/uploads/RCJ-portrait5-186×300

jpg” alt=”” width=”186″ height=”300″ /> Court of Appeal: High Court’s ruling was entirely justified

A solicitor heavily involved with failed claims handler The Accident Group (TAG) has lost his appeal against a High Court decision to strike him off

Anthony Dennison, who was a partner at Rowe Cohen, the Manchester law firm that vetted personal injury claims for TAG – which collapsed in 2003 owing £100 million – had initially been fined £23,500 by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)

Most of the fine was for dishonestly concealing his part-ownership of Legal Report Services (LRS), a company that supplied medical reports for clients for whom Rowe Cohen acted under the TAG scheme – a deal he arranged

The SDT declined to strike him off or suspend him, on the grounds that several years had passed since the events at issue, Mr Dennison had already made payments of £400,000 to his former partners, and no member of the public would be at risk if he continued in practice

Error, group does not exist! Check your syntax! (ID: 14)

Unusually, the Solicitors Regulatory Authority (SRA) appealed, arguing that striking off was appropriate and last year , ,



Legal Futures Blog

Do not fear robot lawyers – fear robot clients

Pulat Yunusov

Tech is famous for its shorter and shorter hype cycles. Robot lawyers were all over the twitters only a few months ago and now people actually yell at you for even mentioning the thing. Of course, robot lawyers should not even have surfaced in the first place because no one is remotely close to building them. Lawyers should not fear for their livelihoods. But there is something that is much more important than robot lawyers. It’s robot clients. Or at least the proliferation of machines, automated transactions, and standardized processes where lawyers once controlled the terrain.

September 20th, 2016